The fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman took place on the night of February 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida in the United States. Martin was an unarmed 17-year-old African American high school student. Zimmerman, a 28-year-old Hispanic American, was the neighbourhood watch co-ordinator for the gated community where Martin was temporarily staying and where the shooting took place. Zimmerman was acquitted of murder on July 13 triggering protests against racial profiling across America and calls for a federal civil rights prosecution.
Zimmerman jury evenly split at first, juror says
Two jurors had voted for manslaughter verdict and one for second-degree murder, she says
Agencies in Washington
A juror from the trial of Florida neighbourhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman for the death of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin said the six-woman panel was sharply divided when deliberations began.
The jurors ultimately came to a unanimous decision, finding Zimmerman not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter in the case that has brought tough questions about racism in the US back to the fore.
But in an interview on CNN, juror B-37, who was not named and was shown in deep shadow, said the first vote was split down the middle between those who wanted an acquittal and those who wanted to convict.
"We had three not guilties, one second-degree murder and two manslaughters," the juror said, adding she was one of the ones who voted not guilty.
Zimmerman, who has a white father and a Peruvian mother, said he acted in self-defence when he shot Martin during an altercation on February 26, 2012. But prosecutors said he profiled and stalked Martin, provoking the altercation.
The juror said it became a question of whether the events leading up the shooting were legally relevant or if, for self-defence, it is the moment before pulling the trigger that counts.
"It was just so confusing with what, and what we could apply to what. Because I mean, there was a couple of them in there that wanted to find him guilty of something," the juror said.
But "after hours and hours and hours of deliberating over the law and reading it over and over and over again, we decided there's just no way".
On one crucial point, she said, most, if not all, six jurors believed it was Zimmerman, not Martin, calling for help in the background of a 911 emergency call.
Martin's mother and brother testified it was Martin's voice screaming for help while Zimmerman's parents and several friends swore they recognised his voice.
"I think it was George Zimmerman's. All but probably one (juror agreed)," the juror said.
She explained her understanding of what happened: "I think George got in a little bit too deep … He shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him and get the one up on him or something. And I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him. I had no doubt George feared for his life in the situation."
But she broke into tears as she described the mental anguish she and the other jurors felt as they weighed their decision.
"It's a tragedy this happened, but it happened. And I think both were responsible for the situation they had gotten themselves into. I think both of them could have walked away."
In the aftermath of the verdict, race again came to the fore, with angry protesters asking if the result would have been the same had Martin been white and Zimmerman black. But the juror said the panel did not discuss race and she did not believe it was a factor in the shooting.
Agence France-Presse, Reuters