• Sun
  • Dec 21, 2014
  • Updated: 7:16pm

Syria chemical weapons attack killed 1,429, says Kerry

US Secretary of State says world cannot let Assad get away with chemical attack

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 31 August, 2013, 2:17am
UPDATED : Saturday, 31 August, 2013, 5:47am

US Secretary of State John Kerry made clear on Friday that the United States would punish Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for the “brutal and flagrant” chemical weapons attack that it says killed more than 1,400 people in Damascus last week.

Kerry said it was essential not to let Syria get away with the attack, partly as a sign to those who might consider using chemical weapons in the future. He said the United States was joined by allies including France, “our oldest ally,” in its determination to act.

“It matters here if nothing is done,” Kerry said in a statement delivered at the State Department.

He said that if a “thug and a murderer like Bashar al-Assad can gas thousands of his own people with impunity,” it would be an example to others, such as, he said, Iran, Hezbollah and North Korea.

“Will they remember that the Assad regime was stopped from those weapons’ current or future use? Or will they remember that the world stood aside and created impunity?” Kerry said.

Kerry laid out a raft of evidence he said showed Assad’s forces were behind the attack, and the US government released an unclassified intelligence report at the same time including many of the details.

The report said the August 21 attack killed 1,429 Syrian civilians, including 426 children.

The intelligence gathered for the US report included an intercepted communication by a senior official intimately familiar with the August 21 attack as well as other intelligence from people’s accounts and intercepted messages, the four-page report said.

France said on Friday it still backed military action to punish Assad’s government for the attack despite a British parliamentary vote against a military strike.

An aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin, a close Assad ally, seized on Thursday’s British “no” vote which set back US-led efforts to intervene against Assad, saying it reflected wider European worries about the dangers of a military response.

Assad’s government has repeatedly denied carrying out the chemical weapons attack, blaming rebels who it suggested were trying to provoke intervention.

Syrian state television, which did not carry Kerry’s speech live, reported that Kerry said the “first and last” aim of any action the Obama administration will carry out in the Middle East was to “guarantee the security of Israel”.

Any military strike looks unlikely at least until UN weapons inspectors leave Syria on Saturday.

Kerry said their report would only confirm that chemical weapons were used, and he made clear that would not change much for Washington since “guaranteed Russian obstructionism” would make it impossible for the UN to galvanise world action.

“The primary question is really no longer, what do we know. The question is, what are we – we collectively – what are we in the world going to do about it,” Kerry said.

The primary question is really no longer, what do we know. The question is, what are we – we collectively – what are we in the world going to do about it
US Secretary of State John Kerry

He said the president had been clear that any action would be “limited and tailored” to punishing Assad, that it would not be intended to affect the civil war there and Washington remained committed to a diplomatic solution to the crisis.

The timing of any strikes may be complicated by Obama’s departure late on Tuesday for Sweden and a G20 summit in Russia.

He was not expected to order the strikes while in Sweden or Russia.

Kerry made clear Washington would not be swayed from acting either by the opinions of other states: “President Obama will ensure that the United States of America makes our own decisions on our own timelines, based on our values and our interests.”

Shifting alliances

Kerry was speaking the day after British Prime Minister David Cameron failed to win parliamentary backing for military action in Syria.

Finance minister George Osborne, one of Cameron’s closest allies, accepted that the vote had raised questions about Britain’s future relations with its allies.

“There will be a national soul-searching about our role in the world and whether Britain wants to play a big part in upholding the international system,” he said.

French President Francois Hollande told the daily Le Monde he still supported taking “firm” punitive action over an attack he said had caused “irreparable” harm to the Syrian people, adding that he would work closely with France’s allies.

Hollande is not constrained by the need for parliamentary approval of any move to intervene in Syria and could act, if he chose, before lawmakers debate the issue on Wednesday.

“All the options are on the table. France wants action that

is in proportion and firm against the Damascus regime,” he said.

Britain has traditionally been the United States’ most reliable military ally. However, the defeat of a the government motion authorising a military response in principle underscored misgivings dating from how the country decided to join the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Russia, Assad’s most powerful diplomatic ally, opposes any military intervention in Syria, saying an attack would increase tension and undermine the chances of ending the civil war.

Putin’s senior foreign policy adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said the British vote represented majority opinion in Europe.

“People are beginning to understand how dangerous such scenarios are,” he told reporters. “Russia is actively working to avert a military scenario in Syria.”

Even a limited strike risks causing unintended consequences.

Syrian ex-soldiers say that military sites in Syria are packed with soldiers who have been effectively imprisoned by their superiors due to doubts about their loyalty, making them possible casualties in any US-led air strikes.

Kerry said the US intelligence community had carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack. “I will tell you it has done so more than mindful of the Iraq experience. We will not repeat that moment.”

Laying out the evidence, Kerry said Assad’s government has the largest chemical weapons program in the Middle East and was determined to rid the Damascus suburbs of the opposition.

“We know that for three days before the attack, the Syrian regime’s chemical weapons personnel were on the ground in the area, making preparations,” Kerry said.

“And we know that the Syrian regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks and taking precautions associated with chemical weapons.”

He said rockets were launched from Assad-controlled areas and fell only on opposition-controlled areas, and he pointed to the thousands of reports and videos on social media from 11 sites in Damascus showing the impact of the attacks.

“We saw rows of dead lined up in burial shrouds, the white linen unstained by a single drop of blood,” he said.

“We know that a senior regime official who knew about the attack confirmed that chemical weapons were used by the regime, reviewed the impact, and actually was afraid that they would be discovered,” Kerry said.


Related topics

More on this story

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Intrecepted comms? We have heard that before.When can we hear them with an independent translation? Remember Colin Powell at the UN in respect of Iraq: "Powell played an intercept of a conversation between Iraqi army officers about the UN inspections. However, when he translated what they were saying, he knowingly embellished it, turning it from evidence Iraq was complying with U.N. resolutions to evidence Iraq was violating them. This appears in Bob Woodward's book, Plan of Attack:
[Powell] had decided to add his personal interpretation of the intercepts to the rehe****d script, taking them substantially further and casting them in the most negative light...Concerning the intercept about inspecting for the possibility of "forbidden ammo," Powell took the interpretation further: "Clean out all of the areas... Make sure there is nothing there." None of this was in the intercept.
This was disgusting war crime and the perpetrators must eventually be brought to justice. But this time, we need the evidence from the UN and other sources to be properly judged before deciding on what form of military response there should be, if any.
very surreal.. here in good ol' USA, we have no money for healthcare for the poor but we have $$$ to shoot missiles for World Cop gigs...
America and Israel love war. It keeps the economy ticking over. Who will be the next one to suffer? More wars, more senseless killing, more feeble excuses, Who are te "Freedom fighters?" Who arms them? Do they represent the people? Were they elected?
John Adams
Indeed Yes .
I don't trust the USA anymore about the "evidence" they have collected in order to have an excuse to fire off missiles for retaliation, or to start a war ( see Iraq ! )
If the UN confirms that Bashar al-Assad unequivocally did use chemical weapons on the rebels, then OK. I believe only the UN, not the USA ( especially after Snowden).
Bashar al-Assad would have had to be totally insane to use chemical weapons knowing the way the US would respond , and which could eventually lead to a US invasion like in Iraq. He is certainly a very ruthless, nasty dictator, but he is not insane
I agreed that the chemical weapons attack is indiscriminate killing. But nonetheless, I thought that Iraq used chemical weapons attack on Iran with a help of CIA during Iraq and Iran war as NPR (Nattional Public Radio) early reports. Well, how many of children and women were killed by the Iraqi chemical weapons attack on Iran during the Iraq and Iran war?
The evidence provided by President Obama, it seems convincing. President Obama indicated "nerves gas" have been used. If rebel are/were able to make the nerves gas work with the help of the inter-network? President Obama should wait until the results of an investigation by United Nations inspectors are revealed that the Syrian government indeed used chemical weapons against its own people. I am sure that President Obama will get more coalition support his action, both domestic and international.
Jennie PC Chiang/江佩珍 08/31/13 美國
you forgot US used chemical bombs on Bosnia during Clinton?
also Nam, lots of chemical weapon used by the american to kill the goons..
Obama cannot wait because someone crossed his "red line"
black dude busy drawing red lines all over the world... funny...
The reason they are attacking Syria is to prevent the completion of the natural gas pipeline as part of the strengthening of the Russia & natural gas producing countries alliance, and soon to be defunct US petrol dollars!!!
When will the International Criminal Court in the Hague start to consider the attrocious acts against humanity pepetrated by the US on so many innocents? Attacking other countries with impunity & without UN permission?
omg , who cares, let them kill each other
you supposed to police every group of idiots that want to beat each other up ?
there are numerous worse atrocities that take place daily , but NOT IN THE MIDDLE EAST


SCMP.com Account