Apple accused of having unstated policy against bitcoin payments
Industry players accuse the company of having an unstated policy against the internet currency
Apple has forced a secure messaging app to remove the ability to send bitcoin payments or be booted off the iOS App Store.
The move reinforces the belief of some industry players that the company has an unstated policy against allowing bitcoin software applications on the store, despite allowing alternative forms of e-commerce such as apps from PayPal and Square.
The app, Gliph, lets users send secure texts and also hooks up with online bitcoin services Coinbase and Blockchain.info to allow them to send money to friends. But that last feature was what raised Apple's ire.
"We were asked by Apple to remove the ability to send bitcoins from the iOS app," the company's co-founder, Rob Banagale, confirmed in a blog post.
"We fought to keep it in but it was not possible ... You can still create wallets, view balances and receive bitcoins in the Gliph app for iOS."
Coinbase itself, one of the two online wallets which Gliph uses to enable the bitcoin payments, was also forced off the App Store in November. Blockchain.info's wallet app was pulled from the App Store in 2012.
Apple, which declined to comment, has been giving conflicting reasons to the developers of bitcoin apps. Blockchain was told that "the facilitation of trading of virtual currency is not appropriate for the App Store", a rule which is not outlined in the company's own App Store guidelines.
Rob Sama, the creator of BitPak, another bitcoin app removed from the iOS store, says that he was told his app was removed because "that bitcoin thing is not legal in all jurisdictions for which BitPak is for sale".
"I inquired as to which jurisdictions bitcoin was deemed to be illegal in, and he told me 'that is up to you to figure out'. I asked him which laws bitcoin violated, and again, he replied that 'that is up to you to determine'," Sama said after his app's demise.
A year before that, Bitcoin Express, an app with similar functionality, was also removed. That time, the app's developer was given a specific rule which was apparently being violated: 22.1 of the company's guidelines, which reads: "Apps must comply with all legal requirements in any location where they are made available to users. It is the developer's obligation to understand and conform to all local laws."
The legal status of bitcoin remains hazy, but there is only one country where even making transactions in the currency has been clamped down on: Thailand. The Thai central bank, not knowing how to deal with bitcoin, issued a preliminary ruling in July 2013 which banned the currency until the bank could determine whether it could be used to speculate on the strength of the baht, which is illegal in the country.
Banagale thinks that Apple's fear is simple. "If you believe Apple's repeated rejection criteria of section 22.1, you could take a view that the company believes the currency will ultimately be made illegal in the United States or other important markets," Banagale said. "Rather than be forced to remove apps once theoretical regulation comes into play, Apple is simply not allowing them to exist in the first place."