Defence says witnesses in Oscar Pistorius trial collaborated on testimony
Defence lawyer says couple who say they heard screams and gunfire the night Pistorius fatally shot Reeva Steenkamp collaborated on testimony
The chief defence lawyer in Oscar Pistorius’ murder trial sought on Wednesday to undermine the prosecution testimony of a couple who say they heard screams and gunfire the night the athlete fatally shot his girlfriend, saying similarities in their accounts indicated that they had aligned their versions at the expense of the truth.
Charl Johnson, a neighbour of the double-amputee runner, had resumed his testimony on the third day of the trial after telling the court in Pretoria, the South African capital, that he heard the cries of a terrified woman and shooting around the time that Pistorius killed Reeva Steenkamp in what the athlete said was an accident in the early hours of Valentine’s Day last year.
Johnson’s wife, Michelle Burger, had given similar testimony and at one point broke down in tears because of what she said was the memory of the terrified screams of a woman.
Defence lawyer Barry Roux said there were differences between the statements that Johnson and Burger had given to police after the shooting, and testimony that they gave in court. Both the statements and the testimony shared similarities, Roux said, implying that the couple had contaminated their evidence by talking through what they were going to say.
Watch: 'I heard her petrified screaming some time during the gunshots'
“You could just as well have stood together in the witness box,” Roux said. “What do you say to that?”
The tart assertion drew a caution from Judge Thokozile Masipa, who told Roux he had gone too far.
Roux contended that crucial elements in the testimony of the couple were missing in their earlier comments to police, including the statements that they heard a woman’s screams rising in anxiety and intensity and that they heard the woman’s voice “fading” after the last in a volley of gunshots.
Johnson suggested that he and his wife were more expressive while testifying in court than when providing information for a police document.
Oscar Pistorius places his head down while sitting in the dock on the third day of his trial in Pretoria pic.twitter.com/cFluFukBTH
— HuffPostUK Pic Desk (@HuffPostUKPics) March 5, 2014
“I would venture a guess that it’s the way you verbally tell the story,” he said. “There’s a lot more emotion involved ... whereas the statement is more factual.”
At the beginning of proceedings on Wednesday, prosecutor Gerrie Nel said Johnson’s telephone number had been read out in court a day earlier. Johnson then said he had since received a “large amount” of missed calls.
He described one voicemail message as saying: “Why are you lying in court? You know Oscar didn’t kill Reeva. It’s not cool.”
Pistorius, 27, has said he shot 29-year-old Steenkamp by accident, fearing she was a dangerous intruder in his home. The case has transfixed people around the world, and the proceedings are being broadcast on television, adding to the scrutiny of South Africa’s criminal justice system as well as the character of a globally admired athlete whose career peaked when he ran in the 2012 Olympics.
Pistorius was born without fibula bones because of a congenital defect and his legs were amputated when he was 11 months old. He has run on carbon-fibre blades and was initially banned from competing against able-bodied peers because many argued that his blades gave him an unfair advantage. He was later cleared to compete. He is a multiple Paralympic medalist but he failed to win a medal at the London Olympics.