bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Fearing an invasion of rabid animals, terrorists, immigrants and the loss of their cherished island isolation, many Britons were highly suspicious of the Channel Tunnel.
But two decades after the sub-sea tunnel linked Britain and France on May 6, 1994, doubters on the northern side of "La Manche" have mostly quieted.
Opponents had warned of a host of dangers, including drug trafficking, potato blight in the "Garden of England" county of Kent, as well as an influx of French spiders and the arrival of bee-killing moths.
Others feared a fatal competitor for car ferries operating the Dover-Calais route and the possible bankruptcy of tunnel operator Eurotunnel.
The darkest nightmares were of tunnel walls collapsing due to flooding, earthquakes or bombs.

In February 1986, British transport secretary Nicholas Ridley sought to reassure concerned lawmakers, saying: "Will rabies come? Will the Russians invade along the tunnel? Should Britain remain an island? I sympathise with these emotional arguments but I do not believe that they are rational."
Some members of parliament called for all carriages to be sealed to prevent unscrupulous travellers dumping their rubbish, attracting foxes and other pests.
In fact, a wild rabid animal was found on a beach in southern England in 1996, the first trace of rabies in the country since 1922. But vets revealed that the offending creature, a Daubenton's bat - an insectivore very common in France - was carrying a virus not transmissible to dogs, horses, foxes or other mammals. Most importantly, it had taken the aerial route across the Channel.
John Noulton, communications director of Eurotunnel, also sought to reassure claustrophobic critics that, although the tunnel was definitely dark, the train journey would be no worse than travelling on "a wide-body jet during the night".
Today, Eurotunnel supporters quote playwright William Shakespeare to describe the scare-stories as "much ado about nothing". In October 2012, the year of the London Olympics, Eurotunnel celebrated its 300 millionth passenger.
To be sure, it has not all been plain sailing.
There was a fire on a freight service in November 1996, and hundreds of immigrants housed at the Sangatte centre in Calais tried to rush the tunnel over Christmas in 2001.
The service suffers occasional cancellations and frequent delays, but works well overall.
The idea of a tunnel under the Channel was mooted by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802, sparking horror in London, where he was regarded as public enemy number one.
These days, Britain and France enjoy close defence ties, although the former is not quite ready to give up centuries of "splendid isolation".
If Prime Minister David Cameron is re-elected next year, he has promised to hold a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union, where voters will have the opportunity to say they want to quit.


After 20 years, Channel Tunnel's doubters quieted by its success

Workers tunnelling from both Britain and France broke through below the British Channel on December 1, 1990. Photo: AFP

Train driver Willy Crooks, at the controls last month, drove dignitaries through the tunnel after the inauguration 20 years ago. Photo: AFP

News

World

Tunnel ended Britain's 'splendid isolation', but it never brought the dangers so many predicted


Fearing an invasion of rabid animals, terrorists, immigrants and the loss of their cherished island isolation, many Britons were highly suspicious of the Channel Tunnel.


After 20 years, Channel Tunnel's doubters quieted by its success

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Tunnel ended Britain's 'splendid isolation', but it never brought the dangers so many predicted

Tunnel ended Britain's 'splendid isolation', but it never brought the dangers so many predicted