What goes up, must come down: Clinton’s post-convention bounce flatlines due to email inquisition
Democratic presidential candidate struggled to explain inconsistencies in her public statements as she faced probing questions from a room full of reporters
Friday could have marked the end of what has been arguably the best week of Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
Coming from a successful Democratic convention, combined with some of the most pronounced Republican infighting to date, Clinton took a commanding lead over her rival Donald Trump, both in national and many swing state polls.
But instead of capitalising on the momentum, she tripped up again on her political Achilles’ heel – emails – before an audience she has kept at arm’s length over the last 16 months – journalists.
Speaking at a gathering of black and Latino reporters and editors in Washington, Clinton struggled to reconcile her previous public statements about the handling of sensitive information over a private email server with the critical assessment offered by the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Over the course of nearly four and a half minutes, Clinton first feinted toward acknowledging a recent misstatement, saying she offered a “short-circuited” response in a Fox News interview last weekend by suggesting FBI Director James Comey had concluded that her public statements about her use of a private email server while secretary of State were truthful. Comey had only said there was no evidence that she had lied to the FBI during its investigation into the matter.
Clinton attributed the confusion to miscommunication, explaining that she had intended to say that her statements in public were no different than those she had made to the FBI.
“What we have here is pretty much what I have been saying throughout this whole year. And that is, that I never sent or received anything that was marked classified,” she said again on Friday.
But critics say that statement does not square with the FBI findings.
The FBI concluded that about 110 of the 30,000 emails Clinton provided for inspection were classified at the time they were sent, though they were not marked as such.
But even if the typical classified headings were not included, Comey said that “participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it”.
More problematic for Clinton was the FBI conclusion that three emails included special markings within the body of the text to indicate certain information was classified. That seemed to contradict Clinton’s assertion that she did not send any emails marked classified.
Although Comey recommended against criminal prosecution over the email episode, he said Clinton had been “extremely careless” in her handling of classified material.
Clinton’s explanation Friday bore all the hallmarks of a legal argument, distinguishing between the special markings included in three emails and the more visible headings that typically are included on such sensitive documents.
Comey said in his testimony last month on Capitol Hill that he did not believe Clinton understood the meaning of the special markings. The State Department also said those markings were improperly applied due to human error, and that the three emails did not contain classified materials at the time they were sent.
But the explanations have not been a particularly satisfying political response, giving her struggling rival a chance to go back on the offensive.
“Clinton’s habitual lying about the use of her secret server to send and receive classified, top-secret information shows her blatant disregard for national security and a continued pattern of bad judgment,” Trump spokesman Jason Miller said. “Clinton knows the actions she has taken are disqualifying for someone wishing to become commander in chief, and that is why today’s painful, pretzel-like response to a simple question about her illegal server was obvious to everyone watching.”
The email controversy has proven to be the biggest drag in how voters perceive Clinton, despite the campaign’s best efforts to paint a more flattering public image. Clinton said on Friday that she “takes it seriously” when polls show that voters view her as untrustworthy, but she also pushed back against such perceptions and cited her record of accomplishments over the years.
“Every time I’ve done a job, people have counted on me and trusted me,” Clinton said during the question-and-answer session at the joint convention of the National Association of Black Journalists and the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
Before last week’s Democratic National Convention, 68 per cent of respondents in a CNN/ORC poll said Clinton isn’t honest and trustworthy. That was up from 65 per cent earlier in July and 59 per cent in May.
“I do recognise I have work to do,” she said.