Maker of ‘pink slime’ drops some targets in defamation case against ABC network
Meat processor Beef Products Inc has dropped more than half the defendants from a lawsuit over its allegations that TV network ABC and others defamed a meat product critics have dubbed “pink slime.”
The company, known as BPI, removed ABC’s news division, reporter David Kerley, two former US Department of Agriculture scientists and a former BPI employee from the lawsuit, according to documents signed by a South Dakota Circuit Court judge on Wednesday.
The ABC network, its former news anchor Diane Sawyer and reporter Jim Avila remain in the case.
BPI sued in 2012 over news reports about its “lean finely textured beef,” a low-fat product made from chunks of beef, including trimmings. It was exposed to tiny bursts of ammonium hydroxide to kill E. coli and other dangerous contaminants.
The lawsuit said they told viewers it was not safe, not healthy and not even meat, causing BPI to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in profits and roughly half its employees.
A trial on the lawsuit is scheduled to begin in June 2017. BPI is seeking US$1.2 billion in damages.
Representatives of Walt Disney Co, which owns ABC, could not immediately be reached for comment. Lawyers for ABC, Sawyer, Avila and Kerley also could not immediately be reached.
ABC has previously said the lawsuit is without merit.
BPI voluntarily dropped defendants “in an effort to streamline and concentrate its case,” Dan Webb, a Winston & Strawn law firm partner representing the company, said in a statement.
The company called ABC, Sawyer and Avila “the primary targets of the litigation” and said dropping defendants was unrelated to the merits of the case.
BPI dropped litigation against Gerald Zirnstein, a former USDA microbiologist credited with using the term “pink slime” to describe the beef product. Former USDA employee Carl Custer and former BPI employee Kit Foshee also were dismissed from the lawsuit.
All appeared or were quoted in ABC’s reports.
Bill Marler, a lawyer for Marler Clark who represented Zirnstein and Custer, said they were glad to be out of the lawsuit. “This whole case is an attack on the media’s responsibility to have discussions about controversial topics,” Marler said.