White House reverses course on green-card holders, but calls travel ban a ‘massive success’
The White House on Sunday tried to tamp down concerns about US President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration order in the face of widespread protests, as some Republicans in Congress urged him to proceed with caution in the face of legal pushback.
Most congressional Republicans, however, remain largely behind the new president, whose order temporarily bars the citizens of seven majority Muslim nations from entering the country.
During a round of Sunday show interviews, Trump’s aides reversed course and said that citizens of those countries who hold permanent residency “green cards” will not be barred from re-entering the US, as officials had previously said.
They stressed that just a small portion of travellers had been affected by the order.
“I can’t imagine too many people out there watching this right now think it’s unreasonable to ask a few more questions from someone traveling in and out of Libya and Yemen before being let loose in the United States,” insisted Trump’s chief of staff Reince Priebus. “And that’s all this is.”
The changes, said White House adviser Kellyanne Conway, are “a small price to pay” to keep the nation safe.
In a background call with reporters, a senior administration official declared the order’s implementation “a massive success story,” claiming it had been done “seamlessly and with extraordinary professionalism.”
But others see the order as ill-conceived and rushed.
The order, which also suspends refugee admissions for 120 days and indefinitely bars the processing of refugees from Syria, has sparked widespread protests and denunciations from Democrats and a handful of Republicans. Many have accused the administration of rushing to implement the changes, resulting in panic and confusion at the nation’s airports.
“You have an extreme vetting proposal that didn’t get the vetting it should have had,” said Republican Senator Rob Portman, who urged the new president to “slow down” and work with lawmakers on how best to tighten screening for foreigners who enter the United States.
“In my view, we ought to all take a deep breath and come up with something that makes sense for our national security” and reflects the fact that “America’s always been a welcoming home for refugees and immigrants,” he said.
The comments came the morning after a federal judge in New York issued an emergency order temporarily barring the US from deporting people from the seven majority Muslim nations subject to Trump’s travel ban. The judge said travellers who had been detained had a strong argument that their legal rights had been violated.
The order barred US border agents from removing anyone who arrived with a valid visa from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It also covered anyone with an approved refugee application.
The Department of Homeland Security, however, said Sunday said the court ruling would not affect the overall implementation of the White House order.
“President Trump’s executive orders remain in place — prohibited travel will remain prohibited, and the US government retains its right to revoke visas at any time if required for national security or public safety,” the department said in a statement.
Top congressional Republicans, meanwhile, were backing Trump despite concerns raised Sunday from a handful of GOP lawmakers.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, said he supports more stringent screening mechanisms, though he cautioned that Muslims are some of the country’s “best sources in the war against terror.”
“I think it’s a good idea to tighten the vetting process But I also think it’s important to remember that some of our best sources in the war against radical Islamic terrorism are Muslims, both in this country and overseas,” he said.
He also stressed the need “to be careful as we do this,” and said it would be up to the courts to decide “whether or not this has gone too far.”
But Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, meanwhile, warned of unintended consequences, expressing fear the order could “become a self-inflicted wound in the fight against terrorism.”
“This executive order sends a signal, intended or not, that America does not want Muslims coming into our country. That is why we fear this executive order may do more to help terrorist recruitment than improve our security,” they wrote.
Trump responded to the pair on Twitter, saying McCain and Graham’s statement was “wrong - they are sadly weak on immigration.” Senators should focus their energies on Islamic State and border security, he said, “instead of always looking to start World War III.”
In a statement from the White House, Trump repeated that the move was “not a Muslim ban,” and said his policy was “similar to what President Obama did in 2011 when he banned visas for refugees from Iraq for six months.”
Trump billed his sweeping executive order as a necessary step to stop “radical Islamic terrorists” from coming to the U.S. It included a 90-day ban on travel to the US by citizens of Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia or Yemen.
But it’s unclear the measures would prevent attacks on American soil. The directive did not address homegrown extremists already in America, a primary concern of federal law enforcement officials. And the list of countries in Trump’s order doesn’t include Saudi Arabia, where most of the September 11 hijackers were from.
Priebus, Trump’s chief of staff, said the ban could be expanded to more countries in the future.
Portman was on CNN’s State of the Union, while McConnell appeared on ABC’s This Week.
Additional reporting by Bloomberg