Advertisement
Advertisement
Consumers
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Shoppers line up outside to the Toys 'R' Us store in Times Square, New York in this file photo. Photo: EPA

Toys ‘R’ Bust: the rise and fall of a retail empire built on child’s play

‘Toy King’ Charles Lazarus designed his company around a supermarket model, with long aisles, discounts, and products stacked high. But now the firm has filed for bankruptcy protection in the US

Consumers

In the early 1980s, a week before Christmas, a woman walked into a supermarket-size store in Tysons Corner, Virginia, and became so dumbfounded that she started talking to herself.

“Where’s the robot?” she said. “And the hairy monster?”

A Washington Post story that recounted her muttering did not say she was delusional. She was simply overwhelmed by a store that had become, in the words of the article “like McDonald’s ... an American institution.”

Toys 'R' Us.

“What we are is a supermarket for toys,” founder Charles Lazarus said at the time. “We don’t have a competitor in variety. There is none.”

Of course, many would eventually come along – Target, Costco, Walmart, Amazon – and force the company and its 1,600 stores into Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Monday night. But back in the 1980s, and for several decades before, Lazarus was right. Nobody could compete.

The “Toy King”, headlines called him.

Lazarus never aspired to the throne. After serving in World War II as a cryptologist, Lazarus returned home to the nation’s capital hoping to start a family. Like his father, the proprietor of a bicycle shop, he wanted to start a small business. Baby furniture seemed like a good idea: GIs wanted to settle down and economic wealth was rising.

In 1948, at the age of 25, Lazarus opened Children’s Bargain Town below his father’s bike shop in Northwest Washington. Business was brisk. Parents soon began asking Lazarus where they could buy toys, so he stocked them. When a parent came back to buy another toy after the first one broke, Lazarus had an epiphany: He might only sell one cot to a family, but toys would keep them coming back.

Late in life, Lazarus was asked in a documentary for his grandchildren whether he had anticipated the baby boom.

“I was fortunate to join it,” he said. “I had no idea to what size the toy business could be.”

Big. Very, very big.

Lazarus got out of the baby furniture business and exclusively into toys, renaming his store – soon to be stores – several times before settling on Toys 'R' Us, with the R printed backward as a gimmick. Supermarkets were his model. Long aisles. Products stacked high. Variety. Big enough to get products at discounts to pass on to shoppers.

The Toy King could play rough, too.
Shoppers in a Toys 'R' Us store in Miami. Photo: AP

“Lazarus offered toy manufacturers the tantalising picture of year-round toy sales and the ability to produce 12 months a year,” Eric Clark wrote in The Real Toy Story: Inside the Ruthless Battle for America’s Youngest Consumers. “But for that, he could extract a price and he did.” Instead of paying for products right away, Lazarus forced toymakers to take payment months later. He demanded exclusives and early releases. He made them advertise – for Toys 'R' Us.

And with his technology background, Lazarus set up a computerised inventory system so from his desk he could see every product sold and what needed to be restocked.

Lazarus embraced change, especially video games, which brought adults who didn’t have kids into the store. “There is an increasingly fine line,” he said, “between where adult begins and child ends.”

But in the 1990s, as other chains got into the toy and video-game business, Lazarus lost his iron grip on toys. He retired in 1994 and watched as the company tried to regroup, refocus, realign – the inevitable buzzwords of decline – and was eventually sold off to the inevitable private equity firms who load companies with debt while trying to turn them around.

“Together with our investors, our objective is to work with our debtholders and other creditors to restructure the US$5 billion of long-term debt on our balance sheet,” the company said in its bankruptcy filing – which is language a long distance from the company’s humble roots and its endless aisles of robots and hairy monsters.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: How toy story ended in US giant filing for bankruptcy
Post