Insurers claim victory in fight for workers switching MPF providers
The sales forces of the insurance companies appear to be winning against the banks after MPF rule changes

Insurers with large teams of agents look to have proven better able to fight for new pension business than banks after employees were allowed to choose their own Mandatory Provident Fund providers two months ago.

The company has attracted one in three of the nearly 31,000 employees who have chosen to switch their providers.
Other insurers such as Manulife and AXA China Region also have seen growth in their MPF business over the past two months. Manulife did not give number but said it had "about two-thirds" of the shift. HSBC and Hang Seng, the banks who are the biggest MPF providers, said they had both seen changes in numbers of MPF members but it would be too early to comment.
Steel told the South China Morning Post: "The insurance companies, which use agents to sell to individuals, are more effective than banks."
When the scheme was set up in 2000, the bank providers were in a better position to compete for business because employers chose the providers and they tended to pick the banks they had business relationships with.