Don't faint. I am going to say something positive about Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's policy address last week.
Earlier this week, I attended a press conference held by a student-led social concern group at City University. It had undertaken a survey on the accessibility of the campus and attitudes towards disability and was publicising the results.
In general terms, the researchers found that much of City University was inaccessible to people with different physical disabilities, yet attitudes were positive. No great surprises there, but what struck me was the way the work was conducted and presented.
The students had co-ordinated across university departments, consulted the community, engaged external experts to conduct credible research and leaned on the students' union for resources. They had produced a comprehensive leaflet in which the results were clear and precise. The panel of speakers was articulate, professional and passionate.
As I sat listening to them present persuasively how physical accessibility was important but only part of the problem because it was co-ordination and total quality management that were required to change values and systems, I found myself musing about how people with disabilities have developed their voice. They have a strong ability to argue strategy and vision for how to ensure they are fully integrated in society, with access to equal opportunities, with evidence behind them and specifics on how to get there.
And that was when I saw Leung's policy address in a positive light for people with disabilities.
He gave disability more airtime than before, mentioning it in 13 paragraphs out of 200, compared to 7 out of 210 in Donald Tsang Yam-kuen's 2011-12 address.
Leung's reference to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities could be seen as a nod to the delegation of non-governmental organisation representatives who went to Geneva last September for Hong Kong's hearing with the related UN committee. Nearly all of their proposals were included in the committee's recommendations to the Hong Kong government.
Leung talked about fostering integration in society, mentioned employment as the key to achieving this, and committed to reviewing the role of the commissioner for rehabilitation to improve co-ordination.
Yes, you could argue it was short on specifics and lacked new policies. Most of the initiatives mentioned are already being implemented and there was no commitment to consider quotas and supported employment, to review the amount and eligibility of the disability allowance and multiple other things the community of people with disabilities have been calling for.
But I asked one active member of the community whether the address could be seen as an open door for pushing. She conceded that she saw a plank that could become a door.
If not exactly a positive response, it could well be the call to rally the increasingly vocal community of people with disabilities to seize the opportunities for change, and to remain united and articulate.
Louisa Mitchell is a research fellow (social policy) at Civic Exchange