Pan-democrats' protest numbers don't add up ...
Do numbers matter? They do, if you use them to advance your cause. Here are some numbers: organisers of the July 1 protest march insist 510,000 people joined.
The University of Hong Kong's public opinion programme put the maximum turnout at 172,000.
The police figure was 98,600.
This newspaper's own study showed 140,408 took part.
Believe what you want to believe. But if you choose a number, do it honestly. Everyone at the pan-democratic camp, from Anson Chan Fang On-sang and Democratic Party chairwoman Emily Lau Wai-hing to Civic Party leader Alan Leong Kah-kit, have insisted on radio and television and in the newspapers that 510,000 took part.
If you hear something often enough, you are brainwashed into believing it is true. That is why most people now believe more than half a million marched last week. Public Eye wants to know this: does the camp doubt the 172,000 figure put out by HKU's POP?
The same people - Chan, Lau and Leong - all insisted in the mass media that 800,000 people voted in the unofficial referendum on universal suffrage last month. And who did the counting? Why, it was the programme's researchers. Does that mean the camp does not believe in the programme's protest turnout figure, but believes in its "referendum" figures?
If so, surely we must all doubt the accuracy of anything the programme does. Or is the camp cherry-picking numbers that suit its political agenda best?
… but Beijing won't be spooked by the maths
Public Eye was mystified as to why the central government chose to issue its politically explosive white paper on "one country, two systems" at the worst possible time, ahead of the unofficial referendum on universal suffrage and the July 1 march.
Surely, we thought, the stern wording of the policy document on Hong Kong would provoke even more people into taking part in both activities. But we are no longer mystified. Public Eye believes the bosses in Beijing deliberately timed the release of the white paper to gauge the worst-case scenario of hostility towards the central government.
Now they know, depending on which numbers they believe. At worst, 510,000 joined the march and 800,000 voted.
The word now going around is that Beijing believes the HKU POP number of 172,000 for the march and that only about half of the 800,000 said to have voted in the "referendum" are genuine votes. Still, are they large enough numbers to spook Beijing? Unlikely.
Reform talks need a middleman, if one exists
Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying and the pan-democratic camp loathe each other so much that the two sides no longer even talk. Any attempt at dialogue deteriorates into a shouting match.
How then can they strike a reform deal with time fast running out? What they need is a middleman with the clout to sit the two sides down and make them talk like grown-ups. With the city now so polarised, does such a person even exist?
The dark truth behind school's abandonment
To all those who have been moaning about the eventual demise of St Margaret's Girls' College: save your breath. The government doesn't give a darn. You know why? The school is top-heavy with so-called ethnic minorities - the local lingo for darker-skinned people, even though Westerners are also an ethnic minority in Hong Kong.
If St Margaret's was full of Westerners or mainland children, you can bet education officials would be rushing to save it. Does anyone hear the deafening silence from the Equal Opportunities Commission?
Michael Chugani is a columnist and television show host. email@example.com