The Pentagon plans to remove 50 nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles from their silos over the next four years but not eliminate them from the US arsenal, a move aimed at complying with a 2010 treaty with Russia and avoiding a fight with members of Congress from states where the missiles are based.
Lawmakers had feared reductions in nuclear forces required under the new Start treaty would eliminate an entire ICBM squadron at one of three air force bases in the states of North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming where the US keeps its 450 Minuteman III missiles. But a senior defence official, who briefed reporters about the plan, said 50 missiles would be removed from silos at the three missile bases. That will keep all nine ICBM squadrons operational.
The decommissioned missiles will no longer be counted as operational under the treaty, but will continue to be maintained and guarded. The silos would also be kept operational, the official said, describing them as "warm but empty".
Lawmakers from the three states applauded the plan, which avoids the need to lay off hundreds of Air Force personnel and cut the millions of dollars that the bases pump into all the local economies.
To comply with treaty limits on warheads and launchers, the Pentagon will also convert 30 B-52 bombers configured for nuclear weapons to carry conventional weapons.
The navy will disable four launch tubes on each of its 14 missile-carrying submarines. The subs thus will carry up to 56 fewer missiles, each with four nuclear warheads.
The treaty calls for the United States and Russia to each cut their deployed nuclear weapons to 1,550 by 2018, down from a previous ceiling of 2,200. It also set a limit of 700 deployed missiles and bombers.
The decision to largely spare land-based missiles is at odds with the recommendations of some outside experts, who have called for eliminating or deeply cutting the Minuteman III arsenal and relying instead on submarines and bombers to carry nuclear weapons.
Bruce Blair, a former ICBM launch officer and founder of Global Zero, a group that seeks elimination of nuclear weapons worldwide, said it would have been more cost-effective and "strategically sensible" to eliminate an ICBM squadron.
Because it is in a fixed location, a Minuteman III missile is more vulnerable to a surprise nuclear attack and therefore would have to be fired quickly in a crisis, making it more destabilising, Blair said. "It is designed strictly to fight a large-scale nuclear war with Russia," he said.