• Mon
  • Dec 29, 2014
  • Updated: 10:34pm
PropertyHong Kong & China

'Taken hostage in China': The Frenchman who can't sell his illegal Beijing penthouse

Frenchman and others unaware they had purchased illegal penthouses

PUBLISHED : Monday, 04 November, 2013, 5:53am
UPDATED : Monday, 04 November, 2013, 12:55pm

When Didier Boissiere paid seven million yuan (HK$8.89 million) for a rooftop apartment in Beijing, it never occurred to him that buying a property in China would leave him stuck there.

After moving from Paris for work in 2006, he bought a 200-square-metre flat at a high-end residential community in the Chaoyang Park area of the city.

Seven years on, Boissiere is planning to move to Mongolia, but has found himself "somewhat taken hostage in China". He can't sell his property because he can't get an ownership certificate. He can't get the certificate because, though he did not know it at the time, he bought an illegal apartment, and the developer won't buy it back.

According to mainland law, property developers should provide ownership certificates to buyers no more than a year after a transaction, but Boissiere has yet to receive one.

In the same boat are about 30 other foreign owners of flats in the Victoria Gardens development, which is near the eastern section of the capital's Third Ring Road.

"We wrote a joint letter to the mayor, but were told that we just have to wait for the developer to comply, which the latter refuses to do," Boissiere said.

Beijing authorities said the developer constructed 19 illegal penthouses, one of which Boissiere owns, and has refused to demolish them, meaning the property company has been unable to apply for ownership certificates from the housing commission.

Boissiere has asked the developer to compensate him for the delay in issuing the certificate or buy back his property at the market price for legal apartments, which have at least doubled since he bought his. He has not received a reply.

Yin Xuefeng , Boissiere's lawyer, called the development one of the many "dead projects" in Beijing, over which the government and the developer have reached an impasse and walked away from the negotiating table.

"There is another dead project near Victoria Gardens, and one in Haidian district, just to mention a few," Yin said.

Staff at the Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, which is responsible for issuing property ownership certificates, and the Beijing Municipal Commission of Urban Planning, which supervises construction, said they had done their part in attempting to resolve the problem.

The urban planning commission said that after the developer failed to tear down the penthouses, as was required before October 19, 2010, it asked Chaoyang district authorities to take action to enforce the removal in February 2011.

Not one penthouse has been demolished since then, but the commission said that "the Chaoyang district government is now actively co-ordinating with related departments to enhance the task".

Boissiere said: "An official at the planning commission's Chaoyang branch even told me, 'The only thing you can do is contact the media to put pressure on the government to move on this', and he sounded truly sincere in making this suggestion."

According to another owner, a Chinese national who has led the battle against the developer on behalf of the residents, the owners sued the Chaoyang district chengguan bureau, which is responsible for forcibly removing illegal buildings, for not doing their job.

But the court decided the bureau was not guilty on grounds that it had not been intentionally avoiding removing the structures, but rather could not do it because many of the penthouse owners were not at home.

The sales office of the developer, Beijing Zhengxujingdian Real Estate Development, a company founded by a Chinese Australian, was closed and has not replied to Boissiere's lawyer regarding the claim for compensation.

Michael Huang, a Singaporean owner, said: "All that can be done is done, and I feel helpless."

Like a number of the other foreign owners, he planned to sell the property when leaving China, though he was not planning to leave as soon as Boissiere.

Boissiere is now planning to bring the case to court following similar unsuccessful attempts by other owners.

His lawyer Yin said: "The difference is that now it's foreigners suing, and I hope authorities will attach more importance to it this time."


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

The result of no rule of law, rampant corruption and hidebound racism which will end up withn the owners getting the shaft.
The lesson? NEVER buy property in the PRC.
One of the reasons why one should be reluctant to purchase new property builds.
There are few illegal buildings in France, given a strong real estate legal environment that is strictly applied and not complying to the rules of Guanxi and briberies like it is unfortunately still the case in Mainland China. Beijing alone has so many illegal constructions, although the Government is probably working hard in cleaning up the mess. Will take a few years probably.
@"the owners sued the Chaoyang district chengguan bureau, which is responsible for forcibly removing illegal buildings, for not doing their job."
Sounds a bit like Hong Kong's Buildings Department but on a smaller scale!
In the same edition of the SCMP there are reports of another horrendous onslaught of pollution in Beijing, an expat who has been effectively swindled into buying an illegal apartment and results of a survey showing China as number one destination for expats.
The money must be very good in China.
Like everywhere: governments fail to make suitable legislations ("loopholes"), then they fail to enforce and control, then they fail to take responsibility and leave it all up to the stupid citizens.
Wonder whether he can likewise buy/sell ILLEGAL buildings in his native France.
no surprise here - that's how it works in the mainland: Nobody has done anything wrong, and even if there's a recognition of the problem then it's probably somebody else who is responsible, and the whole issue gets passed around in circles until the end of time. Plus there's no personal gain for anyone, only work and trouble, so why should they help?
Is 'buyer beware' not something Chinese would think about? If it wasn't conceived by a Frenchman, then someone very nearby, thought up the idea a very long time ago. So long ago that 'caveat emptor' is now part of western 'culture'.
I will dissuade any non-Chinese citizens to buy properties in China. Do not subscribe to its type and greed-driven temptation. China has countless pitfalls targeting foreigners who do not fully understand the concept of rule according to those who have power and not in laws.
Rent and don't buy. Foreign investors can only profit from selling to less-knowledgeable buyers - the bigger fool theory!



SCMP.com Account