Moyes? Surely you got the wrong guy

David Moyes has many admirable qualities but in two key respects he is not the right appointment to succeed Alex Ferguson at Manchester United. He is too old at the age of 50 and he lacks winning experience at the highest level - both crucial sections of the curriculum vitae that any club should give particular attention if they want to compete for the big trophies.

Much has been made of the similarities between Moyes and Ferguson, both of whom were born in Glasgow, played for the big firms of Celtic and Rangers respectively and started in management with unfashionable clubs at a relatively young age.

But there are striking differences between them, too. Ferguson was six years younger than Moyes when he took charge at United in 1986 and he arrived with an impressive list of trophies: three Scottish league titles (breaking the stranglehold of Rangers and Celtic), four Scottish FA Cup Cups, the Uefa Cup Winners' Cup and the Uefa Super Cup.

That made Ferguson a perfect appointment by United, as time would tell despite his often difficult early years. Moyes, by contrast, has a lot of catching up to do and history suggests United have taken a risk by choosing him.

Let's consider the age factor first. While Ferguson himself might appear to prove that an older head is vital, most top managers establish themselves in their 40s and then go on from there.

Every one of the six managers who have won the Premier League were in their 40s when they were appointed by their winning club, even if they were older at the time of their success. In fact, going back to the first English double winners of the modern era - Arsenal in 1970-71 - only two league-winning managers were 50 or older at the time of their appointment.

Those two were Bob Paisley (aged 55 when he was appointed) and Joe Fagan (62), who came out of the famous Liverpool boot room to build upon the success started by Bill Shankly (who was 46 when he took charge at Anfield).