-
Advertisement
BusinessCompanies

Foreign firms caught in China's regulatory web

Foreign firms make easy scapegoats in Beijing's recent probes and penalties over pricing and safety of consumer products

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
The NDRC imposed a record 668.7 million yuan in total fines on six producers of infant formula earlier this month for price fixing. Photo: AFP
Denise Tsang

Faced with public outcries over the high prices and safety hazards of certain consumer products, Beijing has been launching probes and levying penalties on multinational firms, some of which make easy scapegoats.

US technology giants IBM, Oracle and EMC emerged as the latest targets of an investigation into security issues by the Ministry of Public Security and a State Council-backed research centre, the official Shanghai Securities News reported on Friday.

The investigation reportedly stemmed from disclosures by former US National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who claimed the agency had hacked into critical network infrastructure at universities in Hong Kong and on the mainland.

Advertisement

Mainland regulators and the police began a series of probes in recent weeks into how foreign and domestic firms do business, following complaints from the public about unusually high prices on imported infant formula, pharmaceuticals and cars.

Earlier this month, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) imposed a record 668.7 million yuan (HK$841 million) in total fines on six foreign and domestic producers of infant formula for price fixing, which breached the mainland's anti-monopoly law.

Advertisement

"People complained infant formula and medicines were so expensive the NDRC was under pressure to do something about it," John Gong, associate professor of economics at the University of International Business and Economics, told the South China Morning Post. "Foreign firms are easy targets because they don't have much political capital in this part of the world."

Gong said the anti-monopoly law had plenty of room to improve. Just five years old, it was an infant, compared with about 120 years of antitrust law in the United States, he said.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x