bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Alan Lee

Legislators joined teams of university students in a practice debate in the run- up to the final of the Inter Post- Secondary College Debate Competition 2001, to take place tomorrow.

The annual competition, in its 18th year, is jointly organised by Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK) and the Hong Kong Federation of Students, and sponsored by Hang Seng Bank.

It aims to develop students' independent thinking and interest in the art of debating.

The practice debate was arranged for the semi-finalists in the competition which began last month.

The practice was held at the RTHK studios last week.

RTHK Chinese Programme Service head Ava Wong Fat-chi  said she hoped to raise students' awareness of social issues and current affairs through the contest.

'I would like to express my deepest gratitude to all the guests who have joined us here at the debate today,' Ms Wong said.

Debaters from the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the Hong Kong Institute of Education were joined by legislators  Emily Lau Wai-hing and Li Fung- ying.  They argued for the motion to legalise soccer betting.

The team said betting on soccer was one of many forms of entertainment, including horse- racing. It should not be stigmatised and its legalisation would help the Government monitor the practice more strictly. It could also generate revenue for the Government.

Students from Shue Yan Col lege and City University, and legislators Choy So-yuk and Wong Sing-chi, argued against the motion.

They said the Government should not legalise soccer gambling solely for financial benefits. Gambling was among the worst kind of social evil and the root of many problems, such as divorce, domestic violence and suicide.

Its disadvantages would offset any benefits it might generate.

Gambling was also a breeding ground for money-laundering, loan-sharking and many other illegal activities, they said.

Each team was given seven minutes to present their arguments and 30 seconds to sum up before the audience voted.

The Shue Yan College and City University team won the debate when the audience decided overwhelmingly against the motion to legalise soccer betting.



Four legislators join university teams in practice session