The Government recently announced it was launching a new plan to make Hong Kong 'Asia's world city', complete with our new logo, a stylised dragon. I would prefer the Government to have Hong Kong identified with equality, free from discrimination, rather than a mythical dragon.
The Chief Executive stated: 'Our vision is to make Hong Kong play the same role as London plays for Europe and New York plays for North and South America.' One of the reasons they are world-class cities is they welcome diversity and provide formal remedies should problems arise. By having anti-discrimination legislation, these cities tell the world they will take the necessary steps to eradicate discrimination.
The Government wants to attract new business and investment. However, there is no mechanism to ensure business people or investors will be treated equally. If they suffer discrimination, there is no avenue for redress. That does not seem the picture of a world-class city.
Mr Tung's statement goes on to say that Hong Kong's positioning as Asia's world city is based on many things including 'commitment to maintaining the rule of law, freedom of expression and association, the free flow of information, openness and diversity.' The Government is obligated to enact anti-discrimination legislation under several international agreements. How can it position Hong Kong as a world-class city when it fails to implement this key legislation?
I understand the Government has agreed to reassess its position and is beginning consultations with business but will not make a decision until early next year. This is unacceptable. The Government is obligated to legislate. Consultation should be in the form of the legislation.
NAME AND ADDRESS SUPPLIED
