Perhaps we shouldn't expect the descendants of convicted war criminals to have a realistic view of the crimes against humanity of their family members.
Nevertheless, Yuko Tojo ('Defence of a man despised', June 28) really stretches reality too far. According to her simplistic view, the economic embargo imposed on Japan meant that the war was one of 'self defence'.
Such nonsense ignores the fact that, long before that embargo was imposed, Japan had been taking strenuous steps to conquer much of Asia, in a war started by Japan - a war of aggression and territorial gain against many of its neighbours. The way that war was conducted, such as deliberately introducing the plague to parts of China - to say nothing of the Japanese army's truly appalling treatment of foreign civilians and combatants alike - gives the lie to her assertion.
The fact that Japan chose to attack Pearl Harbour, without even declaring war on America, was rightly said by the US president at the time to be an action which will 'live in infamy'. It still does - nor will Ms Tojo's support for her grandfather, General Hideki Tojo, who authorised that unprovoked attack, ever change the true verdict upon him.
PETER SMITH, Mid-Levels
Taken for a ride?
A report on the BBC's World Service (June 28) caused me a good deal of concern.