Internet giants try to find a way to live and grow in China
When Yahoo was forced to give up information that led to the imprisonment of journalist Shi Tao; when Microsoft removed the blog of Michael Anti at Beijing's behest, and when Google launched its censored China service two weeks ago in contradiction of its mission statement 'Don't be evil', their reasoning was the same.
We have no choice, they said. To operate in China means living by Chinese rules.
But the companies do have a choice - it's just not an appealing one.
The firms either annoy their shareholders by ignoring potential business opportunities in China, or annoy freedom-of-speech activists, bloggers and often their customers by giving in to consumer service standards that would never be tolerated in their home markets, and just happen to contradict so-called universal values of human rights. In the cases cited above, the companies clearly sided with the shareholders.
But last week, for the first time, there appeared a tacit acknowledgement from the companies that kowtowing to the cadres in Beijing was having a damaging impact on their interests in the United States.
Microsoft was the first to announce new guidelines for removing offending blogs from its Chinese servers, while maintaining access for overseas readers.