bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sponsorType

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Nicolas Wong Hei, 17

Sing Yin Secondary School

One of the most important fundamental elements of a public exam is that it is fair. Allowing mobile phones in exam halls would definitely cause unfairness.

Some expert  mobile users can surely type and send messages just by putting their  hand in their pocket without looking at the phone. Then the receiver can go to the toilet  and read the answers.  Then there is  internet surfing.

If candidates do not have mobile phones with them it is less likely they will cheat even if they want to. Although they may have another way of cheating, a phone ban  is undoubtedly necessary as it is more than a 'talking' machine.

Though the exam authority says phone ringing is  not allowed in the exam halls, there are still  many reports of this  every year. The ringing is a distraction and disturbs the other students.   Who is going to compensate the candidate if they get a question wrong because of the ringing?

Candidates put themselves at risk if they bring phones into the exam. They can be failed immediately if caught, so  enforcing a ban  ensures they are not punished.

Some people say phones should be allowed in case of emergencies. But I  am sure the exam centre will lend you a phone if you need to make a call. Also, the centre can inform individual students if someone is calling the centre to contact them in an emergency.

Since we cannot 100 per cent ensure students will not use or get distracted if mobiles are allowed, it's better to ban them in the first place.

Phoenix Lee Ching-Kwan, 18

Tin Ka Ping Secondary School

Why should the honesty of all students be questioned because of an isolated incident of cheating? With ever-advancing technology, of course there are always new ways to cheat.

In the past, students cheated by hiding tiny pieces of paper in their pockets or even had notes written on their stationery. But did they try to ban them from bringing these things into the exam hall? No.

We all know this does not work. There is nothing wrong with having these things; it's a case of how you use them.  Under the same rationale, mobile phones are not intended for cheating but as a tool for communication. Of course artful students will make good use of them.  But  they are the minority.  How can we have the preconception that all students are cheaters and impose such an unreasonable measure on them when most have never cheated?

Besides, banning mobile phones in the exam hall is impractical. Anyone who has ever sat an exam knows the importance of having a phone with you that day to contact your parents if you have forgotten your admission form or to connect with friends after the exam. No one can live without it, especially on a such big day.

It would take a long time to collect the phones before the exam, and  how would they identify them? And how could they make sure that each student had only one phone?

Mutual trust between the exam authority and candidates is the key to the issue. Cultivating correct attitudes towards exams in teenagers' minds is the long-term solution.



Should mobile phones be allowed in exam halls?