Q Do you think it is unhealthy to suppress sexual desire?
I am writing in response to the article 'Students pledge to save sex for wedlock' (C3, February 12). As a participant in the student event, I do think it is necessary - not unhealthy - to suppress sexual desire. Sex is natural and wonderful.
But I am opposed to premarital sex and sex outside marriage. Young people have sexual thoughts and desires, but that doesn't mean we have to gratify such needs. We should be able to exercise control over our desires.
I take offence at the suggestion that young people lack knowledge about sex and sex precautions. Sex education starts in primary school and continues in secondary school. Even in biology, we learn more about the various precautionary methods and the principles behind them.
The government has been promoting sex education and the need for precautions, but that doesn't seem to be very effective in curbing underage sex. Merely knowing about the precautions is not enough - we have to bring our own sexual desires under control.
Does it do more harm to suppress sexual desire than to give in to it?
I believe suppressing sexual desire is not a matter of mental health, it is a necessity.