bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sponsorType

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Nicholas Wong Hei, 17

Sing Yin Secondary School

Yes. More and more people are complaining about rising transport costs. Some of them spend one-third of their salary on transport.

Our government is supposed to narrow  the  gap between the rich and the poor. If the government paid for public transport, people could use their money for other purposes, such as shopping, which would boost the economy.

The number of complaints about poor transport services is on the rise, but individual complaints are usually ignored. But if the government paid the fares, it would have the power to negotiate with transport companies and maintain quality services.

Also, if transport was free, people wouldn't have to worry about where they work. For example, if a new town was built, job opportunities would not be confined to the people in the area.

Some people might argue that the authorities would have to spend a huge amount of money and the public might abuse such a system.

But who would take the MTR and travel (mostly in tunnels) if they didn't have to?

To cover transport costs, the government could reduce welfare payments. With free public transport, there would also be less cars on the street. This would mean less pollution and traffic jams.

What would foreigners think if the government  paid for public transport? They  would be impressed by the city's wealth and more willing to invest here.

This could enhance Hong Kong's international image.

Phoenix Lee Ching-kwan, 18

Tin Ka Ping Secondary School

No. Government expenditure is increasing every year, and most importantly, the city's transport costs are reasonable.

Most citizens can afford to take the bus or MTR. I don't see an urgent need to introduce a free transport system.

When it comes to public expenditure,  we must think about the situation thoroughly.

Are Hong Kong's transport costs so high that people have to stay home?  I don't think so. Hong Kong's fares are low compared with other major cities, and children and the elderly receive discounts.

The rest of us should pay for ourselves.  It is our responsibility.

If the government had to pay for public transport, it could affect other public services. A free transport system would not really help the poor.

Some people say free public transport would help alleviate traffic congestion.

I don't think so.  Even free rides on buses, trams and trains  would not make people give up using their cars. We should understand that cost is not the primary concern for people who do not use public transport.  They simply want convenience and flexibility.

The government budget is limited, so authorities should allocate the money wisely. Providing free public transport is not an option.



Should the government pay for public transport?