Should collective memory be considered an artefact that needs to be preserved?

Phoenix Lee Ching-kwan, 18

Tin Ka Ping Secondary School

Collective memory is not same as historical heritage. Destroying buildings or settlements with historical and architectural value just for economic gain is unacceptable. But it's hard to defend protecting collective memory.

There are clear guidelines which explain how a monument can gain protected status. There is no equivalent for memories. Although hundreds of protesters claimed the Star Ferry pier was part of their collective memory, this is a small number compared to the whole population of Hong Kong.

Is this really collective memory or just the memory of the minority?

If collective memory is to be considered as historical heritage, the entire population would have to see future demolition plans to check if they would interfere with their memories. This would be a huge obstacle for the government's redevelopment scheme.