bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

paywallTypes

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Michael Logan

'Open' areas in the city are often shut off by overzealous security guards
Insisting on the right to use public space within a private development can earn you a strong rebuke from  security guards. In one case, it resulted in a call to the police.
The multimedia team of the Sunday Morning Post conducted a test last week to gauge the accessibility of these public spaces. The test involved using a video camera to film city sights popular with tourists.
In two cases - at the fourth-floor public podium at IFC mall and at Swire Properties' Park Court outside Pacific Place - security guards allowed filming without condition.
In the third case, staff working for Hong Kong Land in Exchange Square permitted filming  of the sculptures on public display, but said tripods were not allowed.
At the fourth location, guards reacted differently as we filmed from a public sidewalk in Quarry Bay. Two guards said we were not permitted to take images of the exterior of Taikoo Place, claiming those images were the property of Swire.
Nevertheless,  they took no further action as we continued to shoot, as we insisted filming could take place from a public sidewalk.
The greatest trouble encountered was at the public courtyard at The Center, in Central, which is managed by Citybase Property Management.
Staff said that while the area was public, it was 'under the control' of Citybase and we were  required to apply to management for shooting permission.
Security services manager Terence Mok said someone might trip over our tripod, while our Canon XL1 camera - because of its size - would draw too much attention.
'The tripod and the shooting will affect our guests. They will ask, 'What's going on? What's going on? What happened here?'' he said.
After we turned off our cameras, Mr Mok asked us to erase footage of him, saying we had violated his  privacy.
We declined to do so, explaining we had identified ourselves as reporters and that the shooting took place in a public area. Mr Mok then called the police, in the apparent belief the police could order the footage to be deleted.
However, the commanding officer who arrived at the scene told Citybase it was not within his authority to order the destruction of the private property of another individual.
The Sunday Morning Post informed Citybase that Mr Mok's image would not be used as part of the video report accompanying this story. The test was to measure the openness of these public spaces,  not to highlight the actions of any particular individual.
The police officer proposed to Citybase that it post  its rules clearly on how the public may use the courtyard. The Development Bureau on Friday recommended that property owners across Hong Kong do the same.
Spokeswoman Eunice Chan said Citybase had no rules for the courtyard, 'and so there is no issue, as suggested, to post rules in an area where the public can view them'.
She  said the security guards had  disallowed the use of tripods 'to maintain free flow of passage for the convenience of the public', but did not say why filming was banned.
Asked whether calling the police was an appropriate use of police resources, Ms Chan said this 'should be appreciated as an act to avoid further escalation of arguments'.
However, during 15 minutes of friendly chat as we waited for the police, Mr Mok said we were not being detained, though he wished for us to remain until police arrived to resolve the issue.



Private rules that govern public spaces