Advertisement

Telecom giants not made for each other

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0

THE bitter dispute that has erupted between AT & T and its former close ally in Hong Kong, Hutchison Telecommunications, is the result of changes in the long-term strategic focus of both firms.

When the Hutchison AT & T Network Services (HANS) alliance was cemented in mid-1991 both were committed to policies of rapid and far-reaching expansion in their global reach.

For its part, AT & T had shifted focus from its domestic US market - characterised by vast revenues and healthy margins tempered by limited growth potential - to building a global company.

AT & T chairman Robert Allen declared in 1991 his ambition to build up revenues generated outside the United States, to account for more than 50 per cent, from less than 20 per cent, by the end of the decade.

Hutchison Telecommunications, though obviously far smaller, had no less grand ambitions, committing to enormous telecommunications infrastructural investment in Britain and elsewhere - the firm was bidding for fixed network and mobile telephone licences in Australia, and was involved in various consortiums throughout Asia.

In that heady environment the two firms were seemingly made for each other, with Hutchison's aggressive instincts and existing international telecom investments, particularly in Britain and Australia, making it a handsome prospect for AT & T, who saw thepotential of a partnership as both a supplier of network equipment and expertise, as well as a supplier of cash for equity.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2-3x faster
1.1x
220 WPM
Slow
Normal
Fast
1.1x