Advertisement

Judge says splitting of shares not prohibited activity in Hong Kong

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP

As the Securities and Futures Commission lost its legal bid to derail Richard Li Tzar-kai's HK$15.93 billion PCCW privatisation on suspected vote rigging, the judge also blessed share-splitting, a tactic wealthy speculators can use to swing buyout votes.

Advertisement

Madam Justice Susan Kwan Shuk-hing found Eugene Chuang, the head of stockbroker Chung Nam Securities, doled out PCCW shares to clients to boost the number of people backing the privatisation. But she also ruled this was legal, saying: 'The splitting of shares is not prohibited activity in Hong Kong.'

The February 4 investor meeting approving Mr Li's buyout had 1,404 votes for and 859 against.

As well as bringing the Chung Nam case forward, the SFC alleged Fortis Insurance regional director Inneo Lam Hau-wah had divided 500,000 of his PCCW shares among 495 employees and urged them to vote for the takeover. The judge found no evidence Mr Lam had done so.

In court-sanctioned schemes of arrangement, such as the PCCW buyout, 75 per cent of shareholders must agree deals.

Advertisement

Under the city's so-called 'headcount rule' each investor has one vote. But investors can give shares to associates so they each get votes too, as well as asking them to agree to use these votes to back buyouts.

Advertisement