The rumours and speculation circulating about the health of Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej have been categorised as deplorable in some quarters, but they can hardly be considered surprising.
The king is revered by Thais. His deeds for the poor and perceived humility, gentleness, reserve and religious devotion have them prostrate on the ground when in his presence. So coffee-shop talk about his health is more than mere gossip; it's a real expression of concern about the monarchy in a post-Bhumibol era.
Yet palace statements have been minimal and erratic and have served only to spur gossip. And Thailand's strict lese-majeste laws - which make criticism of the king a serious crime and ensure that only praise of the royal family is published - have led to media uncertain about reporting beyond the scant details, which only serves to heighten speculation. It is little wonder that the Thai stock market bucked the global trend last week when it lost 7.1 per cent in value over two days. The baht has taken a similar battering.
Many people have a professional interest in a royal transition. Diplomats, journalists and academics are high on the list. But more crucially for the nation's future is the reaction of investors, bankers, businesspeople and politicians. Thais, too, naturally turn to the king in times of trouble - and have had to do so often during his 62 years of rule. Starving them of information at such a time with strict controls and the threat of legal sanction fuels doubt and discontent. After five years of political turmoil, faith in institutions has been undermined. Efforts by the government and police to block coverage of royal matters through the lese-majeste law have kept reputable information from domestic and international audiences.
Thailand faces huge challenges. It cannot overcome them if open discussion of matters central to its future are stifled. Interpretation of the l?se-majest? law should be eased to let the media do their job.