The only real timetable for HK is 2047
Frank Ching has accused democrats of inconsistency ('Let's get through 2012 without a repeat of 2005', October 19).
First they asked for a timetable and Beijing provided it; now they want more.
Democrats were doubtless hoping to get through the 2012 debate without a repeat of the friendly fire they had to take from fellow universal suffrage supporters over 2005.
Timetables mean little if the public doesn't know where Hong Kong is going and how it can get there. Beijing's 2007 decision said only that safely-selected chief executive candidates could be elected by universal suffrage in 2017. No date was mentioned for Legco. The decision said only that it could be similarly elected after 2017.
The real question, therefore is, what Beijing means by universal suffrage.
After all, the Chinese constitution grants all citizens universal suffrage and it is practised at the grass-roots level in small constituencies similar to those in Hong Kong's district council elections.