Sacking of the ICAC
ALEX Tsui Ka-kit's adviser was adamant: ''We know there is no way the ICAC want to appear at Legco; they will do everything they can to stop it. Everything. But you didn't get that from me.'' Within a week, Commissioner Bertrand de Speville announced that ''operational necessities'' were no longer a bar to ''public interest'' and he would at last reveal why he sacked Mr Tsui.
This Wednesday, we shall find out if Mr Tsui's bluff has finally been called.
The stakes don't come much higher. For Mr Tsui - once the highest-ranking local in ICAC history - public and legislative support for his sacking could see him sink without trace.
He will need new thunder and good evidence if claims of racial double standards, cronyism and colonialism in Hong Kong's most powerful and secretive law enforcement body can be made to stick.
For Mr de Speville, a man of severe reserve, it may mean destroying the ICAC's reputation in order to save it.
More than anyone else, Mr de Speville knows why he had to sack Alex Tsui but, like Mr Tsui's claims, his reasons could be hard and damaging to prove.