bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

paywallTypes

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Matthew Murchie

Ronald Ling

Matthew Murchie, 15,  St Joseph's College
A lot of people say youngsters' language standards have dropped because of the abbreviations used  in text messaging. 
It's true that many  teens chat online and use SMS to keep in touch with their friends and relatives.
As a result, abbreviations like 'cu' and '88' have become very popular.  
I  think these acronyms  actually help boost communication rather than lead to a deterioration in language standards.
Language is a medium that helps facilitate communication. There are many different languages around the world. They are related to people's cultures and their countries' geographic locations.
Languages evolve with time, and new words and phrases crop up every few years. A good language should include commonly understood and accepted terms.  
As long as the message is understood by the receiver, it is fine.  SMS plays a similar role  to that of a formal language. It is the best tool to demonstrate the effectiveness of using simple  words.
Besides, there are a limited number of characters in each SMS - which can be received within a few seconds - so simple words are important. 
In conclusion, as long as simple text is used properly, it  is a quick and easy way to keep in touch with each other.
Ronald Ling Pak-ki, 19,  University of Hong Kong
During texting, you cannot see the other person's face, you cannot hear their voice and you don't know whether they are paying any attention to you. Instead of boosting interaction between people, I believe text messages can become an obstacle to communication.
Excessive use of abbreviations has made text messaging insincere and repetitive. People around the world use a standardised set of acronyms to replace  more personal expressions.
 It's more satisfying to hear someone say  'That was hilarious, Ronald' than see 'LOL' - the common slang used by millions of people  in  text messages.  Wouldn't you  want someone to say 'It was lovely talking to you, I really enjoyed it'  than have the same old 'ttyl' at the end of every conversation you have?
One cannot deny that text abbreviations do speed up communication. But communication is not all about speed. It would be a terrible shame if a rich and diverse language is converted into a robotic list of abbreviated code words merely to save a few seconds.
Language is a tool  that allows us to convey our  ideas and emotions effectively.  With SMS language, it is impossible to achieve that sort of understanding.




Does simple text language help boost communication?