bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sponsorType

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Cathy Chan, 16,  CCC Kei Chi Secondary School
Physical education has long been compulsory in many schools across the world. Educators say it helps children to develop the habit of exercising. But I think PE actually reduces students' interest in sport so it should not be compulsory.
It is true that PE gives children a chance to try different types of sport, but that does not mean they will develop an interest in them.  
 Forcing students to do something is not an effective or efficient way of developing their interest. 
As PE is one of the school subjects in which students are graded, they are more likely to see it as 'academic work' and less likely to develop an interest  in it.   
Many argue that compulsory PE lessons help to ensure students do a certain amount of exercise and remain healthy, but I have doubts about that.  
According to studies, children should do at least 15 to 30  minutes of aerobic exercises three times a week. But in PE lessons, students are forced to exercise for 45 minutes or an hour. It is very intense. I don't think it's a good way of exercising.  
Exercise should be a hobby that children enjoy, not an 'assignment' that puts them off. 
I think schools should not make PE compulsory. Rather, they should encourage students to exercise on a daily basis by explaining the benefits to them.
Jessica Leung, 16, Our Lady of the Rosary College
Physical education has  been a compulsory subject in schools for a long time and I think it should stay that way.  
I think PE can  raise students' interest in sport  and help them lead a healthy lifestyle.  In PE lessons,  students learn different kinds of sport, such as  basketball, tennis and so forth. 
They can find out which kind of sport they enjoy playing. They develop an interest that could turn into a hobby.  If it became a hobby, they would play it more often and lead a healthier lifestyle.  
Hong Kong students have very little time to  exercise.  Many studies have shown that they lack exercise and that obesity among children and teenagers is on the rise.  PE is a good way of fighting obesity and improving students' health.  
If PE became an optional subject, I think not many students would take it. They would think it's less important because they would not be graded. They would want to spend more time on subjects that count in their final grades. They would not want to spend time on courses that would not help their academic future. This would defeat the purpose of the class.  
In Hong Kong, many people are aware of  the benefits of exercising, but not all of them do it. Having PE lessons  does not only raise students' interest in sport, but also helps them turn it into a life-long habit. What's more, it's easier to get the message of healthy living across to children early in life.  
In conclusion,  PE should be compulsory and is the way to a healthier life.



Should physical education be compulsory in schools?