Advertisement

Compromise on illegal structures the best for all

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP

The Heung Yee Kuk, which represents the interests of indigenous inhabitants in the New Territories, recently staged a confrontation with the government on the issue of illegal structures.

Advertisement

As I have said before, I am all for a negotiated settlement. The problem has become too prevalent to tackle, and so the government should not enforce the demolition of all illegal structures built before a certain date, as long as they are structurally sound and will not cause any public safety hazard. After such a moratorium, the size of the problem would be reduced greatly and the relevant laws could then be strictly enforced in the future.

It is difficult to win public sympathy by arguing that this minority group from the New Territories should be accorded certain privileges forever.

This part of Hong Kong was called the New Territories because it was leased to the British in 1898, decades after Hong Kong Island and Kowloon south of Boundary Street were ceded via earlier treaties. In short, 'New Territories' is a colonial concept, and, after the handover, the term has become meaningless. But we are used to it and do not bother to change it.

Let's now take a Chinese perspective. The indigenous inhabitants of the New Territories are so called because their ancestors settled here a few hundred years earlier than those in other parts of Hong Kong, but they are as indigenous as other Chinese nationals. As such, there is no case for any preferential treatment for this minority group.

Advertisement

It is true that Article 40 of the Basic Law stipulates that 'the lawful traditional rights and interests of the indigenous inhabitants of the 'New Territories' shall be protected by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region'. But the small-house policy was introduced only in 1972. It is commonly regarded as one of the measures to pacify the New Territories after the 1967 riot, and cannot be construed as one of the 'traditional rights and interests of the indigenous inhabitants'. It is open to question that every male adult should be entitled to a free plot of land to build a house, and even more ludicrous to assert that rural buildings are above building codes.

Advertisement