On the political front, a thriving, successful, vibrant Hong Kong would be a huge feather in China’s cap, demonstrating to the world its ability to deploy the “one country, two systems” philosophy effectively. It is therefore in Beijing’s interests to keep Hong Kong running smoothly.

Wu’s point is equally valid. China has much to answer for in sowing the seeds of suspicion and discontent in the minds of Hongkongers. The present resentment could be the blowback of the pent-up sense of helplessness and hopelessness this has fostered. My prevailing memory of the mood of Hong Kong during the handover is one of pride at becoming once again a part of China. The central government should recognise and aim to enhance this sentiment, not crush it.

But Hongkongers must see that if Beijing is faced with continuous criticism, non-cooperation, unrealistic demands and social unrest, this could push it to conclude that the “one country, two systems” philosophy is not worth defending at the cost of global loss of face.

Hong Kong needs not just to “get on with it”, but to change its attitude towards China. This starts with accepting the reality that the city must be an integral part of the country. That said, Hong Kong does have a choice between being just another recalcitrant, subjugated province, or a highly motivated, vibrant, proactive leader in technology, innovation, finance and global reach which Beijing would welcome.

Hong Kong must embrace the second option.

N. J. Cama, Bangalore, India