Advertisement
Hong Kong Basic Law
Opinion

New | Screening out popular candidates does not accord with Basic Law intent

Dennis Kwok looks back at how Basic Law drafters arrived at the wording of Article 45 and says their intent was never to bar candidates with public support from the chief executive election

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
By popular demand
Dennis Kwok

Last month, Chief Secretary Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor invited Li Fei , the Basic Law Committee chairman, to visit Hong Kong, ostensibly to improve our legal understanding of the relevant Basic Law provisions.

Li Fei in Hong Kong. The central government should not waste any more time on conjuring up a system which would screen out others. Photo: Sam Tsang
Li Fei in Hong Kong. The central government should not waste any more time on conjuring up a system which would screen out others. Photo: Sam Tsang
Article 45 of the Basic Law provides for the method for selecting our chief executive "by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures". The term "democratic procedures" has a decisive impact on whether the 2017 election will adopt universal suffrage in its truly democratic form. What exactly did the Basic Law drafters mean by this term?

In 1988, in preparation for the then upcoming first round of public consultation, the drafting committee issued the first draft of the Basic Law. Article 45 at that time only provided that the method for selecting the chief executive "may be modified" in light of the actual situation of Hong Kong and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress - without specifying an end goal or even a general direction, and leaving five vastly different proposals in the draft.

Advertisement

Subsequently, Hong Kong drafter Louis Cha proposed what was then considered an ultra-conservative compromise proposal: the first three chief executives would be elected by a "broadly representative" Election Committee; a referendum would then be held in 2011, the passing of which would mean that the fourth chief executive would be elected by way of universal suffrage, and the Election Committee transformed into a nominating committee.

The Hong Kong public vehemently opposed Cha's proposal for greatly delaying the timetable for universal suffrage. In the meantime, when the mainland drafters came to Hong Kong for an exchange visit, certain members of the Basic Law Consultative Committee took the opportunity to express their view that it would be contrary to democratic principles for chief executive candidates to be selectively nominated via "consultation" among a privileged few, while capping the number of candidates would be unfair and undemocratic.

Advertisement

Despite Hong Kong people's opposition, Cha's proposal still received majority support from the drafting committee, and Article 45 was accordingly amended in the second draft to include the stipulation quoted above.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x