Hong Kong people don't hate the rich - they hate cronyism
Stephen Vines disputes the welfare chief's characterisation of society

Sometimes, a single sentence in an otherwise unremarkable newspaper story really leaps out at you. This week, it happened with a reported statement by Matthew Cheung Kin-chung, the labour and welfare secretary, who said that a new scheme to help stay-at-home parents rejoin the workforce could reduce "the city's hatred of the rich".
This statement provides an unwitting insight into the thinking of senior government officials who are wrapped in a self-reinforcing cocoon and remarkably out of touch with the society they are supposed to serve.
We shall gloss over the general patronising tone of Cheung's other comments accompanying this statement, as he spoke of how "the kids might feel grateful when they grow up…" and might even be able to become the next chief executive.
Patronising people outside their circle is, after all, the default attitude of Hong Kong's elite. However, they seem unaware that there is no hatred of the rich as such, but a deep distrust and loathing attached to the cronyism, institutional obstacles and nepotism that have produced a remarkably small and powerful wealthy elite.
Hong Kong people admire creative and hard-working people who, by their own efforts, have succeeded in making money. Indeed, in this immigrant-based society, the creation of wealth is a widely shared aspiration.
What has changed has been the rapid consolidation of the Hong Kong elite's power and wealth, giving rise to a sense of desperation among those hoping to climb a ladder that evidently has its upper reaches securely blocked.
Moreover, and this is something common to all immigrant-based communities as they mature and become more settled, there is less of a focus on wealth alone. A wider appreciation of other important aspects of life starts to develop. This, in turn, breeds greater social and political awareness of a kind so feared by the elite.