Let's look into 'brownfield' development in Hong Kong before plowing into greenbelts and country parks

READ MORE: Build homes on 'low eco value' Hong Kong parks, suggests Chief Executive CY Leung
Unlike many people, I certainly don't think country parks are sacrosanct. On the other hand, there are clear legal provisions for their protection, so any development cannot be carried out simply as an administrative measure.
We have 24 parks under the Country Parks Ordinance. This law provides the authority to "encourage their use and development for purposes of recreation and tourism", "protect the vegetation and wildlife", and "preserve and maintain building sites of historic and cultural significance". The law explicitly states "[a] presumption against any new development".

Lower on the totem pole are so-called greenbelts. Sites are so designated to help conserve "existing natural environment … at the urban fringe, to safeguard it from encroachment by urban-type development, and to provide additional outlets for passive recreational activities".
