The rich history of mistrust behind China’s warning to George Soros
Tom Plate says Beijing’s suspicion of Western financial advice has its roots in the Asian financial crisis
We start our narrative with the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s. For years, China had been relentlessly advised by US Treasury experts in the Bill Clinton administration, and by other prominent experts in the West, to stop babying its coddled currency and let it go outdoors onto the international markets to play fair and square with other big-time currencies.
In fact, the argument has merit if China is to secure its place in the competitive world marketplace, of which central cosmopolitan idea Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基), the great former premier, was China’s world champion.
In fact, years later, Beijing itself moved in exactly that direction, in part to satisfy the International Monetary Fund that its currency would be cleanly convertible and so globally market-worthy.
But two decades ago, China was not ready for the big bad sandbox, felt both crowded and rushed by the West, and so held back.
READ MORE: Beijing seeks to soothe investor angst with cash and an open door while stepping up tirades on George Soros
Surprise: Suddenly a vile regional currency crisis swept across Asia, from Bangkok to Seoul to Hong Kong. Western speculators, allegedly including Soros (in 1992, he hit his billionaire jackpot with a nervy mega plunge against the sodden British pound), dumped bundles of cash on the bet that weak Asian currencies would lose value, and pocketed fortunes via massive “shorting” campaigns that in effect ground down Asian currencies even more.
China, whose reminbi-exposure caution was then working to great benefit, escaped all that pain – and to that I say thank goodness.
So did our more globally sensitive Western souls who were unnerved by the global turbulence, by the frailty of the fraying “international economic architecture” – and by the heartless display of sheer amoral speculative greed at the expense of the Asian people.
Now for a quick side note: If you claim that “al-Qaeda” short attacking, derivatives spinning and hedge funding more or less belong in the same foul and corrupt financial fruit salad, you might be accused of committing a category mistake.
Surely such a broad definition is forgivable given the delicate, easily fractured interconnectedness of the global financial architecture. But caution and respect are in short supply where greed is abundant. And so sure enough, in 2008 – only a decade after the near-death experience of the Asian financial crisis – the US economy itself almost collapsed into depression.
READ MORE: Why China will not sharply devalue the yuan
The reason: a new financial “al-Qaeda” investment house of cards known as the “subprime” credit default crisis. Need a quick primer on “subprime” but were afraid to ask? See the Hollywood film The Big Short, inspired by the book of the same name. I am serious. Do yourself a favour – don’t miss pop star Selena Gomez explaining collateralised debt obligations. Priceless.
While this bold 2009 move ran the risk of inserting bubbles into the Chinese economy that, down the road, might inevitably lose their pop, some Western financial figures applauded the “flash-flood stimulus”. One was repentant Soros himself, who accepted that the 2008 “Bush bubble” was nothing less than an economic existential threat, and told the Chinese their stimulus response was spot-on.
A Beijing shaken by the US housing collapse greatly appreciated that support. But that was then, and this is now – so guess what?
Where did that outburst come from? It turns out that, at the recent annual retreat in Davos, one famed Western figure airing the view that China is “doomed to a crash” was Soros himself.
While the old “shorting” master is no longer active (and surely Xinhua must know this), in some eyes he remains the international icon (for all his commendable philanthropy) of sadistic currency and equity profiteering.
These warnings are really directed generically rather than individually – at the global class of fast-buck investment jackals that care for no one’s welfare other than their own. It’s not hard to believe in the potential sting of the Xinhua threat. It’s also not hard to believe that Chinese officials won’t move to shelter the currency again.
Even some Western authorities won’t blame them for that. They know how predatory their own can be. Sometimes, it is only common sense to get the heck out of the sandbox when the bullies in them are trying to pull off their shorts.
Columnist Tom Plate, the Distinguished Scholar of Asian and Pacific Studies at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, is working on a book on President Xi Jinping