Should a food that is banned elsewhere really be allowed here?

Difference in dealing with issue over chemical in some mooncakes highlights need for a review of guidelines on food safety

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 14 September, 2016, 1:03am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 14 September, 2016, 1:03am

When the Centre for Food Safety earlier announced that all the 170 mooncake samples tested were satisfactory, it was taken as an assurance that they are safe to eat. Like in the tests for other festive delicacies, the benchmarks used seldom raised questions. Test results by the watchdog are generally seen as trustworthy.

But the health scare in Macau involving a popular Hong Kong brand has raised questions about our food safety standards. Officials in our neighbouring city ordered a recall after a sample of mooncake from Hang Heung Cake Shop was found to contain excessive aflatoxin B1, a chemical that could cause liver cancer.

We won’t pull our mooncakes yet, Hong Kong brand insists despite exceeding Macau carcinogen level

Whether the same batch of mooncakes had been tested by the Hong Kong government earlier is still unclear. But the samples would have been given the go-ahead anyway, as our standard for the substance in question is reportedly much more relaxed.

Given the level of the toxin was found to be 2.48 micrograms higher than the permitted level of 5 micrograms for every 1,000g per sample, having a mooncake or two during the Mid-Autumn Festival is unlikely to result in liver cancer. But the local community is entitled to ask whether the standards should be tightened in the wake of the discrepancy between the two places.

The health chief explained that the international food code does not prescribe a standard for foods like mooncakes, and each location will come up with a level of control based on citizens’ eating habits and risk assessment. He pledged to do more tests, adding that the standards would be reviewed periodically.

Mooncake scare is a Mid-Autumn Festival tradition

The Mid-Autumn Festival delicacy is known for its high sugar and fat content anyway. Moderation is advisable. But the health scare is not just a timely reminder to choose wisely. Consumers look up to the government for clear guidelines on what is or is not safe to eat. It makes no sense when the same food that has been banned elsewhere is still deemed safe to eat here. The gap in the toxin levels in Macau and Hong Kong can hardly be justified. A review of our standards is necessary.