My Take‘2030 Plus’ master plan provokes more questions than answers
We only need to revert to the government’s desperate measures if we continue to allow extreme unfairness, exploitation and inefficiency in our land use
For the longest time, I had believed that if all its other policy initiatives failed, the property and land supply policies of the Leung Chun-ying government would still be a defensible legacy.
But its defences and justifications sound increasingly spurious and hard to understand. Either their formulations are incoherent or there are hidden agendas – read special interests.
It took the government two years to produce its “2030 Plus” land development master plan. But every time an official comes out to defend or explain it, it leaves me scratching my head. According to assistant planning director Amy Cheung Yi-mei, Hong Kong might have to choose between building an artificial 1,000-hectare island east of Lantau and developing some of the city’s country parks, to fulfil a long-term need for land. She was speaking this week at an advisory body to the Country and Marine Parks Authority.
Come again? We only have a choice between trashing our marine environment or our country parks?
There are about 1,200 hectares of brownfields across Hong Kong, so why can’t we develop them first? Cheung says most have inadequate infrastructure and are usually remote. And country parks and a fake island in the middle of the sea come with developed infrastructure?
There are roughly 930-plus hectares of rural land earmarked for the building of small houses reserved for indigenous male villagers under the so-called ding rights.