Hong Kong’s Palace Museum plan throws out the rulebook to put politics above the people
Dennis Kwok says the surprise announcement of a local version of Beijing’s heritage museum displays a blatant disregard for established procedure and public opinion that goes against Hong Kong’s core values
At the centre of the controversy is the complete lack of public consultation on the project. Rather than taking the usual route, where the administration makes a proposal that is then opened up to public scrutiny, this project was unilaterally decided and set in stone – save for minute details.
Hong Kong Chief Secretary Carrie Lam links Beijing Palace Museum row to leadership bid
Rather than being funded by the government, as public work projects usually are, the museum will have the Jockey Club acting as sole financier, providing as much as HK$3.5 billion for the entire construction.
Secretive deal on Hong Kong Palace Museum will further erode trust in authorities
Despite the government’s denial, it is not difficult to deduce that the seeking of funding from the Jockey Club was a deliberate act to bypass the need to obtain legislative approval.
Watch: Protesters say Palace Museum ad evokes Tiananmen crackdown
At no point in time was Legco consulted. Transparency as to the arrangements of the project was entirely lacking. The fact that the government has already appointed Rocco Yim Sen-kee as the design architect and obtained approval for the same from Beijing’s Palace Museum is also problematic.
It is part of the government’s policy and, indeed, a delegated function of the Architectural Services Department to design and build local public museums, and it is not for the government to deviate from the conventional museum building policy by appointing a specific architect without following any of the usual official procedures.
Hong Kong architect ‘engaged’ to design Palace Museum ahead of Carrie Lam’s announcement of project
I do not contest his appointment in terms of his capability and expertise, but the emphasis on experience – that experience is everything – is nothing but a myth.
Citing the costs that would be incurred and the time that would be taken as excuses is unacceptable: the cost would be minuscule compared with the HK$3.5 billion earmarked, and the invitation to tender would only last three to five months, which might have been completed by now if this was initiated when the project started in September.
And even if Yim’s design is so specific and spectacular that no other competitor is comparable, it would have been beneficial to have at least invited a few renowned firms to compete on a specific brief.
Removing the possibility of competition simply hurts the creative process, particularly with the design of a museum, whose artistic nature means it can deviate from conventional architectural designs and imaginative architectural solutions can be incubated, explored and embraced.
Dennis Kwok is a member of the Legislative Council for the legal functional constituency and a founding member of the Civic Party