bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Alex Lo

First, mea culpa. My Monday column on the airport’s scandalously faulty HK$1.5 billion-plus US-made air traffic control system apparently failed to raise some key issues. Luckily, several well-informed readers – among them flight controllers and an aviation engineer – came to the rescue and put me on the right track.
The weekend incident saw the RaytheonAuto Trac III (AT3) lose information on the positioning and altitude of a large number of flights for 15 minutes. Civil Aviation Department officials claim the outage was caused by too many flight controllers logging on to the system at the same time.
Well, care to answer the following:
How many controllers are supposed to log in at the same time?
How many were logged in at the time of the outage?
Why were more controllers than the system could handle allowed to log in?
If this was a known deficiency, why wasn’t there a safety limit set within the software to pre-empt the problem?
Did Raytheon know about this issue and has it warned CAD beforehand?
Aviation authority to reconsider retiring old air traffic control system in light of latest glitch
Here is another line of questioning from someone who is familiar with the history of the AT3. The system was bought in 2011 and was meant to be running by the end of 2012. It didn’t become operational until last November.
Is there a provision in the government contract with Raytheon that a financial penalty would be imposed for each day of delay, and if so, how many days of delay in total may be counted by now?
If such a penalty clause exists, why are we not suing Raytheon for compensation, but instead, are paying the US company to rectify the problems with its faulty system?
How much have we paid, and will we be paying, Raytheon to clean up its own system, and why?
Is it true that the main airport in New Delhi has dropped its AT3 software and switched to rival contractor Indra? Indra, by the way, was the company that CAD passed over for Raytheon in an apparent breach of bidding protocol.
Did New Delhi only buy the AT3 software and not the whole system, as CAD had claimed?
So, some answers please! And CAD, don’t bother to start a witch hunt, as you have imposed a gag order on your staff. None of those readers work for you.


Travellers recognise the strengths of Hong Kong International Airport

Hong Kong airport named world’s best at Global Travel Awards 2026

Restriction on power banks on flights should not have come as a surprise

Greater Bay Airlines to raise fuel charges by 34%, joining other Hong Kong carriers

Hong Kong aviation

Unanswered questions over the air traffic control system debacle

The Civil Aviation Department said that having too many flight controllers on the system caused an outage on the air traffic control system, losing positioning of flights for 15 minutes during the weekend. Photo: Dickson Lee

Hong Kong’s air traffic control system suffers another glitch

Air traffic controllers using the new system at Hong Kong International Airport. Photo: Dickson Lee

Opinion

From exactly what happened in the latest incident with the system to the details of the contract with the manufacturer, authorities must come clean


My Take

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}From exactly what happened in the latest incident with the system to the details of the contract with the manufacturer, authorities must come clean

From exactly what happened in the latest incident with the system to the details of the contract with the manufacturer, authorities must come clean