Trump may have botched Syria, but his China trade strategy deserves praise
Robert Delaney says the impact of Donald Trump’s decision to launch missile strikes on Syria is still unclear, but his trade strategy with China is already yielding results. The question is whether he can extend the benefits to the long term by bringing in US allies
Trying to remake the region in Washington’s image, he argued, got the United States nothing but more debt.
The aftermath of Trump’s latest aggressive move may seem like a strange time to praise the US leader. But some credit is due when it comes to his approach to another problem, one with heavier long-term consequences than Syria.
This forces us to look at Washington’s diplomacy with respect to China in a new light. In the decade and a half before Trump took office, Washington policymakers and advisers did a wonderful job giving the country’s leaders face, but they got very little in return. It took unvarnished threats from an unhinged American leader to break the logjam.
Beijing’s defenders will say the reforms Xi and his team are now pledging align with China’s own interests and would have happened regardless of how loudly Trump pounded his fists. But the timing makes it difficult to suggest Washington’s threats played no part.
This gives more credibility to those who have said all along that China sees concessions as a sign of weakness, and that the country’s leadership respects power above all else.
China is no longer the economic backwater it was when Washington and other developed countries – goaded by multinational companies salivating over the chance to enter the country’s markets – agreed to a playing field tilted in favour of domestic companies in exchange for WTO entry.
If the smoke of Trump’s impulsive foreign policy tactics clears, will US allies be forgiving enough to join a coalition with the US to ensure Xi follows through on his pledges? Stay tuned.
Robert Delaney is a US correspondent for the Post based in New York