image

LGBTI

Hong Kong’s HIV problem: prejudice is the real malady in a society where intolerance is still prevalent - and accepted

Anson Au says the cutbacks in government funding for HIV prevention and treatment in the face of rising infection rates among gay men point to an unpalatable truth: discrimination against sexual minorities is tolerated in Hong Kong

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 31 May, 2018, 8:00pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 31 May, 2018, 8:51pm

The results of the most recent survey by Hong Kong’s Centre for Health Protection on HIV prevalence and risky behaviour, released this week, found that 6.54 per cent of 4,133 respondents who said they had sex with men have HIV, a rise from roughly 4 per cent in the past three surveys.

The Virtual Aids Office, an initiative under Hong Kong’s Department of Health, has also just released a report drafted in March that shows the number of cases of HIV infection has increased over the past 10 years, amounting to an overall growth of as much as 50 per cent. In May last year, the government’s Advisory Council on Aids said the number of Hongkongers living with HIV could increase by 35 per cent in the next four years, with an estimated 74 per cent of infections affecting men who have sex with men.

We appear to be bordering on a health epidemic for HIV/Aids. Given the virus’ prevalence in men who have sex with men, the issue hasn’t earned much attention among the wider public, but where it has, it invokes much controversy and political rifts.

Watch: Showing support for gay rights with hugs in China

Conservatives are largely indifferent to the news. The refrain often goes: why should taxpayers pay for health care for people who “get sick by their own choice”? Why should the government give special treatment to sexual minorities?

The claim is in fact false. The Hong Kong government cut funding for HIV prevention at the end of last year, forcing testing groups and outreach services to cut back on services or charge users for basic sexual health services. The cost of HIV/Aids treatment was never a heavy burden on taxpayers in the first place, and the government does not give special treatment to sexual minorities.

End of HIV? HKU scientists testing new antibody drug to combat virus

Besides, we contribute our tax dollars to treatments for cancer and other diseases that are related to smoking, drinking, and other wilful lifestyle behaviour, yet we’re not up in arms over this.

Assertions about wasted tax dollars and special treatment by the government are a smokescreen for the real reasons HIV/Aids is such a contested topic, and they hide the full picture of why HIV infection rates are rising. It comes down to a conservative intolerance of sexual minorities, which leads to a belief that members of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual) community who get infected with HIV are only getting what they deserve.

Why awareness campaigns won’t save LGBTI people from discrimination

Such prejudices are grim echoes of a parallel historical narrative. Beginning in the 1960s and reaching its height in the 1980s, an unprecedented Aids epidemic swept through the United States. Thousands were getting infected. Unsure of whether to hate Aids or gay people more, doctors, nurses and health-care professionals entered rooms dressed in full contamination gear and kicked food trays to the dying like they were animals. And many were dying. The disease took friends and entire social circles.

A crude precursor of contemporary antiretroviral treatments was created by the Burroughs Wellcome Company, but it was prohibitively expensive and out of reach for many.

Yet people didn’t care. In the midst of all the death and fear, the government remained silent and some people even cheered the fact that this so-called “gay-related immune deficiency” or, more colloquially, “gay cancer” was purging society of all its apparently unwanted members.

The epidemic raged on till LGBT individuals began to take action in what would become one of America’s most prominent civil rights movements. The movement challenged the status quo to reaffirm the LGBT community’s rights as citizens and, essentially, their right to life. The largest public health campaign in the history of the nation was then mounted to educate individuals about safe sex practices.

We are facing a similar crisis today – not just a health crisis, but a crisis of respect and the ethics underpinning it. Survey research on Hongkongers’ attitudes towards LGBT people, sexual orientation, discrimination protection, and same-sex marriage shows that much intolerance still exists in the city. Most respondents in a representative sample of Hong Kong adults were opposed to same sex marriage, according to one study published in 2017, while close to 50 per cent of Hongkongers do not have a positive view of homosexuality or sexual discrimination protection.

Watch: What does it feel like to be a sexual minority in Hong Kong

Hong Kong transgender lecturer tells of her struggle to be accepted

So long as discrimination is tolerated, the recent government funding cuts for HIV/Aids prevention and treatment will only be the start. The rate of HIV infection is already increasing and will continue to be a problem.

But we can do better. We have the tools to do so. We know what HIV/Aids is. We have prevention methods and treatments based on decades of robust science. They are affordable, especially for the government. What we need is public education efforts for the general public, particularly young people, about HIV/Aids and how to prevent it, how it’s transmitted, and how it can be treated.

‘Taiwan’s HIV test kit collection at convenience stores a viable model’

More importantly, the LGBT community needs a cohesive civic movement to organise and protect themselves, as well as to help launch campaigns to promote acceptance of social differences.

The problem we face isn’t just a health issue; that a group of already disadvantaged people have their rights threatened in the face of ignorance, silence and judgment signals the death of a just and equitable society.

German pastor Martin Niemöller famously spoke on the silence that greeted the systematic purge of target groups during the Nazis’ rise to power: “First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.”

Those words are now enshrined in the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Let’s not ostracise one group as they battle disease and death, as well as an insensitive government amid a sea of public discrimination. When one group falls, another may follow. The perpetrators of today may be the victims of tomorrow. When the chips are down, who will be left to stand up for us?

Anson Au is a visiting researcher in the Department of Sociology at Hong Kong Baptist University