Advertisement
Advertisement
A couple take a picture in a field of fireweed at the Hitachi Seaside Park in Hitachinaka, Japan, on October 22. The Japanese yen has strengthened in value in recent months despite the yield differential between US and Japanese government bonds. Photo: Reuters
Opinion
Macroscope
by Neal Kimberley
Macroscope
by Neal Kimberley

Why the Japanese yen’s prospects continue to be rosy and there is little policymakers can do about it

  • Neal Kimberley says worries about the US-China trade war are fuelling demand for the yen, strengthening the currency to Japanese exporters’ dismay
  • Meanwhile, China’s looser monetary policy at a time when other central banks are tightening their belts underpins the drop in the yuan’s value
Japan’s exporters may be encouraged by the prospect of warmer economic ties between Beijing and Tokyo but will still have to contend with a strong Japanese yen that is eroding their competitiveness, both in China and on the global stage. The currency market appears to have decided that one by-product of the US-China trade war should be a stronger Japanese currency.
That yen strength may persist even though the Bank of Japan’s ultra-accommodative monetary policy settings continue to stand in stark contrast to the Federal Reserve’s commitment to hike US rates. Ordinarily, that yield differential might be expected to lend itself to a weaker, not stronger, Japanese yen versus the US dollar, with investors tempted to switch out of Japan’s currency into greenbacks. But such a switch, by definition, incorporates a currency risk.

Failure to incorporate a currency hedge would leave a Japanese investor exposed if the yen then rose against the US dollar. The benefits in yen terms of locking into a higher US yield would be eroded, or even cancelled out, by the fall in the greenback’s value.

Of course, a Japanese investor could seek to hedge such a currency risk but, as Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities (MUMSS) pointed out last week, those hedging costs have surged recently, “reflecting even greater demand for [US] dollars”. “Towards the end of September, costs had surged above 3 per cent … At this level, a currency-hedged investment in US bonds could hardly be considered enticing,” MUMSS wrote. “Although long-term US Treasury yields have topped 3 per cent, after hedging costs are deducted they are effectively on a par with (or even lower than) yields on long-term Japanese government bonds.”

Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda attends a news conference at the bank’s headquarters in Tokyo in July 2018. The bank’s monetary policy remains ultra-accommodative in contrast to other central banks. Photo: Reuters

A Japanese investor could still proceed on an unhedged basis, accepting the currency risk, but would need to believe that the yen would either be stable or weaken versus the greenback. Such an argument might currently be hard to make.

The US-China trade war has led to greater economic uncertainty and a contraction in risk appetite among investors. In such circumstances, the currency market historically ascribes safe haven status to the yen and purchases it accordingly.

HSBC’s October Currency Outlook suspects “risk aversion will be an important contributor to capping US dollar-Japanese yen”, noting how the market “has become newly concerned about US-China trade relations, perhaps because the tensions are now occurring against a backdrop of weak global equity markets.” It additionally argues that “Italian budget concerns are also playing a role in tempering risk appetite.”

That latter point is worth noting. To the extent that market concerns about Italy might mean some less demand for euros, those concerns could also translate into a lower value for the euro versus the yen and is arguably reflected in the downward move in the euro-yen exchange rate over the last month.
Italian Minister of Economy and Finance, Giovanni Tria, talks as a picture of the European Union’s budget chief Pierre Moscovici is projected on a giant screen, during a state television programme, in Rome on October 24. The European Commission has rejected Italy’s proposed budget for next year, arguing its deficit and spending are out of line to keep its debt in control. Photo: AP

Yet the major issue supporting the notion of the yen as a safe haven is surely investor worries about the present US-China trade war.

The sight of the world’s two largest economies embroiled in a trade war, with few signs of a swift end, is hardly going to bolster global investor confidence and is very likely fuelling a degree of demand for the yen, whether Japanese exporters and Tokyo policymakers like it or not.

New phases in the US-China trade war have been accompanied by a market-led weakening of the Chinese yuan versus the US dollar, just when higher currency hedging costs are also undermining arguments for Japanese investors to exchange yen for US dollars. China’s currency has consequently also been depreciating versus Japan’s.

The yuan-yen exchange rate has generally been falling since June, with the move not just a function of the trade war itself but also of investor reaction to accompanying adjustments in China’s own monetary policy.

Japan’s own monetary policy settings remain highly accommodative, but it is also the case that Beijing has understandably reacted to the onset of the US-China trade war by seeking to boost domestic demand both through fiscal adjustment and looser monetary policy.

A looser Chinese monetary stance, when other major economies are either not currently easing policy further or, as in the Fed’s case, are actively raising rates, arguably underpins market-led yuan weakness, including versus the yen.

Japan’s exporters will be unimpressed with this yen strength but there is little Tokyo policymakers can do about it. The market appears to have calculated that the combination of a China-US trade war, and less compelling arguments for Japanese investors to seek higher US yields, support yen strength.

The prospect of warmer China-Japan ties shouldn’t affect that calculation.

Neal Kimberley is a commentator on macroeconomics and financial markets

Post