Singapore trades freedoms for a liveable city. Hong Kong is trading its freedoms for nothing
- Singapore is clean, convenient and meets its citizens’ housing needs, although political free speech is limited. Hong Kong has none of the benefits, and its edge in personal liberties is rapidly eroding
Hong Kong or Singapore? The debate rages over which is better. Let’s end it here and now. I was in Singapore last week after being away for years. First impressions matter. The taxi driver who took me to my hotel chatted cheerfully throughout the ride.
We talked politics, housing and quality of life. Out of curiosity, I asked what would be an appropriate tip. He politely replied he was fine with a big, small or no tip at all.
During my stay, I bet myself I would come across at least one grumpy taxi driver who would refuse to take me where I wanted to go. I didn’t. Hong Kong’s taxi associations should arrange education trips to Singapore. I asked one about Singapore’s much-lauded public housing and he volunteered to show me the oldest one.
Images of the squalor of some of our older public housing estates went through my mind. Instead, I saw freshly painted blocks that could easily pass for private housing in Hong Kong. Singapore’s public housing estates have a spacious feel, nothing like the cramped concrete jungles here.
And guess what? Very few flats, private or public, had unsightly laundry hanging on windows or balconies. In Hong Kong, even multimillion-dollar harbour view homes have laundry drying on balconies or from windows. What’s the point of paying big bucks for a view, yet blocking it with underwear?
