The Hong Kong National Party was a threat to national security and its ban is totally justified
Gu Minkang says an organisation does not need to carry guns to pose a real threat to national security. The Hong Kong National Party’s willingness to resort to violence and call for an ‘armed revolution’ needed to be taken seriously
There is a view that for an act to constitute conduct endangering national security, there must be evidence of force or violence. There are a few reasons why I disagree.
“One country, two systems” is the policy that has underpinned the constitutional framework for Hong Kong since the handover, and it is guaranteed by both constitutional law and the Basic Law. A critical element of this policy is the protection of national unity and territory integrity. Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right, but it is not an absolute right and could be limited in certain situations.
Each jurisdiction has its own standards in restricting certain speech and certain organisations. In Germany, for example, people are prohibited from displaying Nazi symbols and making the Hitler salute. It is also a crime to deny the Holocaust.
China has been invaded by numerous foreign powers and still struggles to safeguard national unity and territorial integrity. Hence, the Chinese have taken great care to guard against any elements which may divide the country and endanger national security.