Opinion | Hong Kong gets the crowds it wants from building the mega bridge. Oops

Alice Wu says officials’ failure to foresee the disruptive visitor influx from the newly opened Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge boggles the mind, but is hardly the only example of government incompetence. Think Typhoon Mangkhut travel chaos, for one

Reading Time:3 minutes

Police officers stand by while protesters shout slogans during a rally against illegal tour guides that have been blamed for worsening the problem of overcrowding in Tung Chung. Photo: Sam Tsang

Published: 7:00am, 19 Nov 2018Updated: 7:03am, 19 Nov 2018

If you build it, they will come. The mega Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge has been built and they, the people, have come. And, for some strange reason, our officials have reacted like deers caught in headlights.

Why else would the bridge be built, if not for the easier movement of people and goods? But yet, the government has completely failed to anticipate what the bridge could bring to Hong Kong – in terms of both the number of visitors and the number of problems. The problems involving insufficient numbers of “golden buses” – shuttle buses that take visitors between the three ports – and the long queues for clearing Hong Kong customs and immigration were shocking because they’re such “low-level problems”, and we have come to expect more from the government.

Typhoon Mangkhut revealed the government’s inability to accurately assess and effectively respond to problems, resulting in traffic and travel chaos in the aftermath of the storm. In the same way, the heated rows over the influx of visitors that descended on the residents of Tung Chung after the opening of the bridge revealed how inadequate the government was in foreseeing the impact, and then in coming up with mitigating measures.

It’s not rocket science, really, to expect fallen trees after a typhoon or an increased numbers of tourists swamping areas closest to the point of entry. But, yet, our government was caught by surprise.

It’s hard to believe officials went into this bridge project blind. It would seem they were only concerned with the time and cost of construction. The government was blind to what the bridge would mean for Hong Kong – beyond dressed-up figures showing economic benefits and fancy slogans about creating an economic hub – in terms of how it would affect the everyday life of ordinary Tung Chung residents: we are talking about noise levels, the length of queues for public transport and at neighbourhood restaurants, and other daily disruptions.

It’s not that the government doesn’t have the resources, either. It has data it can use as a reference and, given the delays to the project, it had plenty of time. The government just didn’t do its job; its errors are of the most elementary kind.