Why Trump may be right to treat North Korea and Iran’s nuclear programmes differently
François Godement says there is a common factor in Trump shredding the Iran nuclear deal and trying to reach one with North Korea: past deals with both have failed to rein in their missile programmes, as well as their trade between each other and with Syria
The relationship between Iranian and North Korean proliferation is deep and long-standing, with mutual help at critical junctures and a converging connection to Syria. Separating the proliferators makes sense.
Yet, while Iran recovered some financial resources with the 2015 agreement, North Korea endured increasingly biting sanctions. Iran is only a threshold nuclear power while North Korea, after decades of efforts, is a nuclear weapons state.
The Iran agreement did not include such a prohibition, and while North Korea did sign an agreement covering missile launches, it then argued satellite launches were not included. Iran developing more ballistic missiles or a nuclear submarine, when it’s supposed to desist from nuclear weapons, is a farce.
The replacement plant was supposed to be built by 2003, with verification of activities certified by the IAEA. Instead, construction stopped in 2003, with the agreement formally denounced in 2006, by which time North Korea had started its nuclear-enrichment programme.
Iran did not demonstrably cheat on the 2015 agreement, but has developed a massive ballistic programme. North Korea is accustomed to cheating yet presents less danger to its region, except in pre-emptive or suicidal self-defence. The design of Iranian and North Korean conventional submarines share commonalities; Iran has the cash to develop nuclear propulsion.
By happenstance or design, Trump’s initiatives build on the differences between Iran and North Korea. For Iran, missiles are paramount. The US-France-UK strikes on Syria and devastating Israeli hits on underground structures deliver the message that Iran’s missile sites could also be hit.
Watch: Western allies express concern after Trump pulls US out of Iran deal
Against all expectations, Kim’s propaganda machine is balancing China, while giving huge domestic exposure to developments under way with South Korea, China and the US. Meanwhile, Trump is likely to disappoint regional allies, especially Japan, by leaving in place shorter-range missiles and perhaps warheads.
François Godement is the director of the European Council on Foreign Relations’ Asia & China programme and a senior policy fellow. He is a non-resident senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from YaleGlobal Online http://yaleglobal.yale.edu