
Culture shock: the upside-down world of white families navigating Hong Kong’s local school system
Julian Groves says as a growing number of Western expats place their children in government-funded Chinese medium of instruction schools, they come up against similar challenges to those South Asians face in a system unprepared for their presence
“Do you realise this is a Chinese school?” the deeply-concerned head teacher told an American mother of two primary school-aged children after she handed in an application for her children to study at her local Chinese medium of instruction (CMI) government school last year.
This mother is one of a growing number of parents who either grew up in Hong Kong or have settled here for work from the West, and seek to put their children through the local education system rather than the private English medium of instruction (EMI) international schools.
Aside from having to persuade teachers at the better schools to admit their children, many of the parents we interviewed reported that their children experienced problems in the schools to which they were admitted. An architect from Italy, the mother of two daughters, told us that the teachers at her local Chinese primary school held little expectation that her eight-year-old would handle the language requirements. Consequently, her teacher put her daughter on separate tables with other English-speaking children and gave her less-rigorous assessments.
Our interviewees had to get used to a system of education that was totally different from what they were accustomed to, and one which they would have difficulty coping with. Aside from the vast amounts of memorisation required of students, one parent told us that his son was given 67 pieces of homework over a period of 18 days.
International schools, [parents] worry, do not prepare students for the increasing number of jobs that require bilingualism in the region
Further, since assignment instructions are in Chinese, these parents cannot help their children with their assignments, let alone read school notices or attend Parent Teacher Association meetings, also exclusively conducted in Chinese. The story is, of course, all too familiar to Hong Kong’s working-class South Asian minorities who face the same problems, but do not necessarily have the means to send their children to private EMI schools or invest in the extra tuition required.
So why would these seemingly wealthy Western expatriate parents put themselves through this, whereas many local Chinese families struggle to put their children in international schools? They have little choice, according to most that we spoke to. International schools, they worry, do not prepare students for the increasing number of jobs that require bilingualism in the region.
“They’ll go to university in the UK, but not get a job in the region [if they return] because they can’t speak Chinese,” a freelance writer and father of two children told us. “They’ll have to go somewhere else, which is not their home.” Other parents were more idealistic about the prospect of their children moving outside the “bubble of privilege” they associated with international schools and mixing with local students.
A mother of two primary school-aged children told us they could probably have managed the fees if they had pulled together all their assets. “But what if one of us had lost our jobs? Like my husband subsequently did,” she said. “There’s no way you could keep that up. It’s like paying for a university education every year for two kids, for 12 years each. And it doesn’t get any cheaper in high school.”
Indeed, whereas the children of Western expats used to dominate ESF schools, in the academic year 2016-17, whites made up only 12 per cent of the ESF school population. The majority of students are now of Asian descent, typically those of wealthy Hong Kong residents returning from overseas or from the mainland who prefer an EMI Western-style education for their children.
It is telling that none of our informants’ children ever made it to CMI secondary schools. In 2016, there were only some 55 recorded cases of white children attending Year 6 of primary school, according to a report compiled by Puja Kapai at the Centre for Comparative and Public Law at the University of Hong Kong.
Watch: What’s it like for Hong Kong ethnic minority students to take the DSE
It is understandable that teachers at top CMI schools would be reluctant to accept children of mixed-language abilities when they increasingly have to compete with each other for funds on the basis of their students’ examination results rather than being rewarded for inclusion, and where there are inadequate public resources to ensure high academic achievement for all, regardless of nationality or language ability.
There is also remarkably little help or encouragement for the children of non-English-speaking residents to integrate into the local education system, particularly in the early years. Meanwhile, the shortage of affordable international-style education – that could benefit all residents – serves only to preserve the privileges of a small wealthy minority, leaving the children of South Asian and Western migrants, who hope to fully integrate into Hong Kong society, stuck in lower-band schools that many Chinese parents avoid.
Julian M. Groves is an associate professor of social science education in the Division of Social Science at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. He teaches and conducts research on migrant domestic workers, youth, gender, and education in Hong Kong
